Bankruptcy judge OKs most of Dewey’s $700,000 bonus plan
After a prolonged losing streak, Dewey & LeBoeuf finally got some good news yesterday, when a federal bankruptcy judge approved the firms plan to pay $700,000 in bonuses to its remaining employees.
July 31, 2012 at 06:59 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
After a prolonged losing streak, Dewey & LeBoeuf finally got some good news yesterday, when a federal bankruptcy judge approved the firm's plan to pay $700,000 in bonuses to its remaining employees.
The decision comes little more than a week after a U.S. bankruptcy trustee rejected the bonus proposal, saying that the firm had not provided sufficient information to show that the arrangement was economically feasible.
But Judge Martin Glenn was more amenable to Dewey's plan, approving nearly all of Dewey's requests, with the exception of a plan to pay workers up to $100,000 in discretionary funds. In his order, Judge Glenn said that “the cost of the Retention Plan is reasonable in light of the possible consequences the Debtor would face if it were unable to stop more Employees from leaving.” Dewey had previously complained of losing 102 of the 150 employees who originally stayed to wind down the firm's operations and collect legal fees.
Under the current plan, nonmanagerial employees can earn extra retention pay by staying with the firm past a certain date. Three other employees, including Dewey's billing and collections manager, could receive extra incentive pay, based on their ability to collect outstanding fees from clients.
The bankrupt firm hopes to collect from more than just its ex-customers; it's also trying to recoup up to $90.4 million in a clawback settlement with former partners, who have until Aug. 7 to sign on to the deal.
Read more at the Wall Street Journal and Reuters.
And for more InsideCounsel coverage of Dewey, see:
After a prolonged losing streak,
The decision comes little more than a week after a U.S. bankruptcy trustee rejected the bonus proposal, saying that the firm had not provided sufficient information to show that the arrangement was economically feasible.
But Judge Martin Glenn was more amenable to Dewey's plan, approving nearly all of Dewey's requests, with the exception of a plan to pay workers up to $100,000 in discretionary funds. In his order, Judge Glenn said that “the cost of the Retention Plan is reasonable in light of the possible consequences the Debtor would face if it were unable to stop more Employees from leaving.” Dewey had previously complained of losing 102 of the 150 employees who originally stayed to wind down the firm's operations and collect legal fees.
Under the current plan, nonmanagerial employees can earn extra retention pay by staying with the firm past a certain date. Three other employees, including Dewey's billing and collections manager, could receive extra incentive pay, based on their ability to collect outstanding fees from clients.
The bankrupt firm hopes to collect from more than just its ex-customers; it's also trying to recoup up to $90.4 million in a clawback settlement with former partners, who have until Aug. 7 to sign on to the deal.
Read more at the Wall Street Journal and Reuters.
And for more InsideCounsel coverage of Dewey, see:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
8 minute readWhy ACLU's New Legal Director Says It's a 'Good Time to Take the Reins'
'Utterly Bewildering': GCs Struggle to Grasp Scattershot Nature of Law Firm Rate Hikes
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250