ABA says disclosing client information to other firms is ethical
Lawyers always want to act ethically, but ethics is an ever-evolving area, as evidenced by the amended model rule that the American Bar Association (ABA) House of Delegates approved this week.
August 09, 2012 at 07:41 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Lawyers always want to act ethically, but ethics is an ever-evolving area, as evidenced by the amended model rule that the American Bar Association (ABA) House of Delegates approved this week. The rule states that disclosing client information when lawyers are trying to move from one firm to another is ethical, an issue that the ABA had never previously addressed.
When attorneys are in talks for a new job, or when their firm is thinking of merging with another, disclosing the identities of clients and the amount of business they generate is ethical, the ABA says, because the information can help point out any conflicts of interest that might exist. However, the model rule states that lawyers still should not reveal clients' financial information.
Of course, the rule is just advisory, but many state and city bar associations don't have rules covering this topic, and the guidance could help many lawyers in such jurisdictions.
“Our hope is that with clear rules there will be less disclosure of client information that shouldn't be disclosed,” said Jamie Gorelick, the co-chair of the ABA Commission on Ethics 20/20.
Read more at Thomson Reuters.
For more InsideCounsel stories on ethics, see below:
How well do you know attorney-client privilege?
Lawyers should use caution when researching jurors online
Gut checking your company's attitude toward ethics
SuperConference Ethics Boot Camp reviews best practices for internal investigations
Lawyers always want to act ethically, but ethics is an ever-evolving area, as evidenced by the amended model rule that the American Bar Association (ABA) House of Delegates approved this week. The rule states that disclosing client information when lawyers are trying to move from one firm to another is ethical, an issue that the ABA had never previously addressed.
When attorneys are in talks for a new job, or when their firm is thinking of merging with another, disclosing the identities of clients and the amount of business they generate is ethical, the ABA says, because the information can help point out any conflicts of interest that might exist. However, the model rule states that lawyers still should not reveal clients' financial information.
Of course, the rule is just advisory, but many state and city bar associations don't have rules covering this topic, and the guidance could help many lawyers in such jurisdictions.
“Our hope is that with clear rules there will be less disclosure of client information that shouldn't be disclosed,” said Jamie Gorelick, the co-chair of the ABA Commission on Ethics 20/20.
Read more at Thomson Reuters.
For more InsideCounsel stories on ethics, see below:
How well do you know attorney-client privilege?
Lawyers should use caution when researching jurors online
Gut checking your company's attitude toward ethics
SuperConference Ethics Boot Camp reviews best practices for internal investigations
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawyers Drowning in Cases Are Embracing AI Fastest—and Say It's Yielding Better Outcomes for Clients
GC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
8 minute readWhy ACLU's New Legal Director Says It's a 'Good Time to Take the Reins'
Trending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250