Dewey seeking to shutter Russian, Kazakh offices
The Dewey & LeBoeuf saga took on some international flavor this week, as the bankrupt firm asked for permission to shut down its offices in Russia and Kazakhstan.
August 10, 2012 at 07:58 AM
8 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The Dewey & LeBoeuf saga took on some international flavor this week, as the bankrupt firm asked for permission to shut down its offices in Russia and Kazakhstan.
Dewey opened its Russian office in 1991 and its Kazakh outpost in 1995. Following the firm's bankruptcy, however, 42 attorneys from those locations jumped ship for Morgan, Lewis & Bockius.
In a court filing, the firm urged a U.S. bankruptcy court to authorize the proposal, saying that “if [Dewey] does not properly wind down its former Russian/Kazakh offices, the temporary registered representatives of the offices will likely resign, and [Dewey] may face possible criminal and civil liability for failing to comply with applicable Russian and Kazakh law.”
The firm also cited the potential financial gains resulting from the wind-down. It estimates that it will cost $11,480 to close both offices. After those costs and taxes, the firm says it could collect as much as $158,000 from clients and the offices' bank accounts, which would go toward paying off its estimated $315 million debt. The U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Manhattan will consider Dewey's proposal at a Sept. 20 hearing.
Read more from the Wall Street Journal.
Find InsideCounsel coverage of Dewey here:
The
Dewey opened its Russian office in 1991 and its Kazakh outpost in 1995. Following the firm's bankruptcy, however, 42 attorneys from those locations jumped ship for
In a court filing, the firm urged a U.S. bankruptcy court to authorize the proposal, saying that “if [Dewey] does not properly wind down its former Russian/Kazakh offices, the temporary registered representatives of the offices will likely resign, and [Dewey] may face possible criminal and civil liability for failing to comply with applicable Russian and Kazakh law.”
The firm also cited the potential financial gains resulting from the wind-down. It estimates that it will cost $11,480 to close both offices. After those costs and taxes, the firm says it could collect as much as $158,000 from clients and the offices' bank accounts, which would go toward paying off its estimated $315 million debt. The U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Manhattan will consider Dewey's proposal at a Sept. 20 hearing.
Read more from the Wall Street Journal.
Find InsideCounsel coverage of Dewey here:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
8 minute readWhy ACLU's New Legal Director Says It's a 'Good Time to Take the Reins'
'Utterly Bewildering': GCs Struggle to Grasp Scattershot Nature of Law Firm Rate Hikes
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250