Visa/MasterCard credit card fee settlement with retailers moves forward
Despite opposition from some of the countrys largest retailers, the biggest antitrust settlement in history is chugging right along.
August 10, 2012 at 07:58 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Despite opposition from some of the country's largest retailers, the biggest antitrust settlement in history is chugging right along.
The $7.2 billion whopper of a deal, between a class of retailers and Visa Inc., MasterCard Inc. and several banks, is meant to resolve allegations that the credit card companies and banks conspired to fix credit and debit card use fees, known as swipe fees, which cost stores every time a customer makes a purchase using a card. Under the terms of the settlement, the defendants would pay $6 billion to the class, and reduce the swipe fees for eight months, resulting in savings of $1.2 billion.
Wal-Mart, Target and the National Association of Convenience Stores all expressed disapproval for the settlement, mainly because it allows the credit card companies to raise the fees again in the future.
But in spite of the resistance from some heavyweight players, the plaintiffs are not planning to make any changes to the proposed settlement before submitting it for preliminary approval by Oct. 19, according to co-lead counsel Craig Wildfang.
“We're going as fast as we can – not as fast as we'd like, but we're making progress,” Wildfang told U.S. Magistrate Judge James Orenstein during a hearing in Brooklyn federal court.
Read more at Thomson Reuters.
Follow InsideCounsel's coverage of the case:
Wal-Mart disapproves of $7.25 billion credit card fee settlement
Merchants say card companies' liable for more than $10 billion in damages
Despite opposition from some of the country's largest retailers, the biggest antitrust settlement in history is chugging right along.
The $7.2 billion whopper of a deal, between a class of retailers and
But in spite of the resistance from some heavyweight players, the plaintiffs are not planning to make any changes to the proposed settlement before submitting it for preliminary approval by Oct. 19, according to co-lead counsel Craig Wildfang.
“We're going as fast as we can – not as fast as we'd like, but we're making progress,” Wildfang told U.S. Magistrate Judge
Read more at Thomson Reuters.
Follow InsideCounsel's coverage of the case:
Merchants say card companies' liable for more than $10 billion in damages
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
5 minute readIn-House Lawyers Are Focused on Employment and Cybersecurity Disputes, But Looking Out for Conflict Over AI
Trending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250