Dewey asks court to approve $70 million clawback settlement
After lying low for more than a week, Dewey & LeBoeufs estate is back in court, this time asking a judge to approve a proposed clawback settlement with former partners.
August 30, 2012 at 07:52 AM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
After lying low for more than a week, Dewey & LeBoeuf's estate is back in court, this time asking a judge to approve a proposed clawback settlement with former partners.
The firm paid $432 million to 670 partners in 2011 and 2012. According to court filings, it has recovered approximately $71 million from more than 400 of those partners. Ultimately, it hopes to raise $89 million in contributions, slightly less than the $90.4 million it originally sought.
In return for their contributions, partners will be exempt from any future lawsuits related to the firm's demise, although ex-partners and their current firms may face claims for unfinished legal business transferred from Dewey.
In its request, Dewey's estate urged the bankruptcy court to approve the settlement, arguing that “the alternative to the [settlement]—commencing over 400 cases that each turn on unique facts—could involve substantial risk and uncertainty.”
The firm also sought to forestall a motion by a group of retirees to appoint an independent trustee to oversee the bankruptcy. The former partners argue that the settlement favors highly paid partners and firm management, but Dewey maintains that their request for a trustee is “proof that their goal is destruction of a landmark agreement.”
The now-defunct Dewey filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on May 28, and reportedly owes as much as $560 million to creditors. A hearing on the proposed settlement is scheduled for Sept. 20.
Read more at the Wall Street Journal and Thomson Reuters.
And for more of InsideCounsel's Dewey coverage, see:
Analyzing Dewey's latest operating report
Infographic: The timeline of Dewey's downfall
Former Dewey partners to pay at least $50 million in clawback settlement
Dewey seeking to shutter Russian, Kazakh offices
Bankruptcy judge OKs most of Dewey's $700,000 bonus plan
Dewey paid executive partner $190,000 after bankruptcy filing
Former Dewey partner sues management, claims they were “running a Ponzi scheme”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom Reluctant Lawyer to Legal Trailblazer: Agiloft's GC on Redefining In-House Counsel With Innovation and Tech
7 minute readLegal Tech's Predictions for Legal Ops & In-House in 2025
Lawyers Drowning in Cases Are Embracing AI Fastest—and Say It's Yielding Better Outcomes for Clients
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250