Facts & Figures: More companies extend equal benefits to transgender employees
From law school rankings to law firm revenues, an inside look at the numbers that count
September 21, 2012 at 09:17 AM
11 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Alumni Advice
Kids these days. In spite of near-constant coverage of student loan debt and a struggling legal job market, aspiring lawyers choosing where to attend law school continue to prioritize school rankings over factors such as affordability and job placement statistics, according to a study from Kaplan Test Prep. In a follow-up study, however, recent law school graduates advised prospective students to reconsider their priorities. Read on for the results of both studies.
32% Prospective students who said that a law school's ranking was the most important factor in their decision
13% Prospective students who rated affordability/tuition as a top concern
8% Prospective students who ranked job placement as a top concern
48% Recent graduates who said that prospective students should place the most weight on job placement rates or affordability (each response garnered 24 percent of the vote)
17% Graduates who said that a school's ranking was the most important factor
Flagging Faith
Law firm managing partners continue to lose confidence in the economy, according to a new study from Citi Private Bank, which asked partners at 79 law firms to predict whether economic conditions would be better or worse in the second quarter of the year, compared with the first quarter. Although most respondents felt the same—and a significant number said they felt “somewhat better”—overall confidence in the economy fell by 19 points from last quarter.
28% Respondents who felt “somewhat better” about the economy in the second quarter of the year, as compared to the first quarter
17% Managing partners who felt “somewhat worse” about the economy in the same time period
29% Managing partners who expect to see some growth this year (40 percent expect growth below 5 percent)
17% Respondents who expect the number of equity partners to increase by more than 3 percent in the next year (more than one-third said they expect an increase of up to 3 percent)
Accelerating Actions
2011 was a record year for patent infringement actions, according to a recent study from PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), which calculated that 4,015 such actions were filed last year. In light of these results, PwC advises attorneys to pay close attention to damages assessments: This year has already seen two awards of roughly $1 billion. Read on for more results:
4,015 Patent infringement actions filed in 2012
22% Increase in number of patent infringement actions over 2010
$4 million Size of the median damages award between 2006 and 2011
$8.7 million Median jury damages award between 2006 and 2011, compared to $0.4 million awarded by the bench
34% Success rate of patent infringement actions for practicing entities, compared to 23 percent for non-practicing entities
Cost Concerns
Wells Fargo has some good news and some bad news for Biglaw. The good news: Law firm revenue increased during the first six months of 2012. The bad news: Costs rose even faster during the same period. The largest firms fared slightly better, which the study attributes to their ability to control expenses. Still, Wells Fargo warns, the second half of the year is shaping up to be even slower than the first half.
3% Increase in law firm revenue between January and June 2012
6.5% Increase in costs during the same period
1% Increase in net income in firms with profits per partner of at least $2 million, compared to the first six months of 2011
1% Increase in the total number of hours that partners worked in the same period
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBallooning Workloads, Dearth of Advancement Opportunities Prime In-House Attorneys to Pull Exit Hatch
The Reason a GC Abruptly Departs May Not Be What You Think
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250