Companies increase legal spending, both in U.S. and abroad
A survey of 260 companies conducted by HBR Consulting revealed that legal spend increased in 2010 and 2011 from the previous survey that covered 2009 and 2010.
September 28, 2012 at 06:57 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
A survey of 260 companies conducted by HBR Consulting revealed that legal spend increased in 2010 and 2011 from the previous survey that covered 2009 and 2010. The data includes both money spent on in-house legal departments and on outside counsel.
The companies, 70 percent of which have Fortune 500-level revenues or above, increased their international legal spend by a median of 5 percent, while spending in the U.S. grew slightly less, by 4 percent.
The uptick in spending can be traced to two main causes: an increase in hiring within legal departments, and higher billing rates for outside counsel. More than 50 percent of the surveyed companies said they had added more staff lawyers between 2010 and 2011, and the average hourly rate for the three most expensive U.S. law firms increased by $45 in the same period.
Read more at Thomson Reuters.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of legal spending, see below:
ACC lauds its 2012 “Value Champions”
3 cost-cutting tips for legal departments
Law firm billing rates steadily climbing despite down economy
Despite uptick in class actions, in-house counsel plan to spend less
A survey of 260 companies conducted by HBR Consulting revealed that legal spend increased in 2010 and 2011 from the previous survey that covered 2009 and 2010. The data includes both money spent on in-house legal departments and on outside counsel.
The companies, 70 percent of which have Fortune 500-level revenues or above, increased their international legal spend by a median of 5 percent, while spending in the U.S. grew slightly less, by 4 percent.
The uptick in spending can be traced to two main causes: an increase in hiring within legal departments, and higher billing rates for outside counsel. More than 50 percent of the surveyed companies said they had added more staff lawyers between 2010 and 2011, and the average hourly rate for the three most expensive U.S. law firms increased by $45 in the same period.
Read more at Thomson Reuters.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of legal spending, see below:
ACC lauds its 2012 “Value Champions”
3 cost-cutting tips for legal departments
Law firm billing rates steadily climbing despite down economy
Despite uptick in class actions, in-house counsel plan to spend less
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Lawyers Drowning in Cases Are Embracing AI Fastest—and Say It's Yielding Better Outcomes for Clients
GC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
8 minute read
Why ACLU's New Legal Director Says It's a 'Good Time to Take the Reins'
Trending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
