“Innocence of Muslims” actress refiles suit with added copyright claim
If at first you dont succeed
September 28, 2012 at 08:17 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
If at first you don't succeed…
Cindy Lee Garcia, an actress who appeared in the controversial anti-Muslim film “The Innocence of Muslims” has refiled her lawsuit against the filmmaker, Google Inc. and Google-owned YouTube, just days after a judge denied her original motion.
Garcia says her involvement with the film began when she answered a casting call for a movie called “Desert Warrior.” According to her suit, neither the script nor the filmmaker, Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, ever referenced Muslims or Islam. But when a 14-minute trailer for the film was subsequently released on YouTube, the original version had allegedly been redubbed with new dialogue that depicted Muslim prophet Muhammad as a womanizer and child molester.
The trailer ignited furor throughout much of the Middle East, including Egypt, Yemen and Libya, where U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other diplomats died in an attack on the American consulate.
Garcia initially sought unspecified damages for fraud, slander and invasion of privacy, among other charges, and also asked a judge to issue an injunction that would remove the film's trailer from YouTube. After a judge denied that motion last week, Garcia refilled the suit with an additional copyright claim.
Garcia is advancing a somewhat novel argument: that she owns a part of the copyright to the onscreen performances that she “authored,” as she never signed a release form transferring her intellectual property rights to the filmmaker. To make matters more intriguing, Garcia is also suing the hundreds of YouTube users who have reposted the trailer on the video-sharing site.
Read more at the Wall Street Journal and the Hollywood Reporter.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of film-related lawsuits, see:
If at first you don't succeed…
Cindy Lee Garcia, an actress who appeared in the controversial anti-Muslim film “The Innocence of Muslims” has refiled her lawsuit against the filmmaker,
Garcia says her involvement with the film began when she answered a casting call for a movie called “Desert Warrior.” According to her suit, neither the script nor the filmmaker, Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, ever referenced Muslims or Islam. But when a 14-minute trailer for the film was subsequently released on YouTube, the original version had allegedly been redubbed with new dialogue that depicted Muslim prophet Muhammad as a womanizer and child molester.
The trailer ignited furor throughout much of the Middle East, including Egypt, Yemen and Libya, where U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other diplomats died in an attack on the American consulate.
Garcia initially sought unspecified damages for fraud, slander and invasion of privacy, among other charges, and also asked a judge to issue an injunction that would remove the film's trailer from YouTube. After a judge denied that motion last week, Garcia refilled the suit with an additional copyright claim.
Garcia is advancing a somewhat novel argument: that she owns a part of the copyright to the onscreen performances that she “authored,” as she never signed a release form transferring her intellectual property rights to the filmmaker. To make matters more intriguing, Garcia is also suing the hundreds of YouTube users who have reposted the trailer on the video-sharing site.
Read more at the Wall Street Journal and the Hollywood Reporter.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of film-related lawsuits, see:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Lawsuit Against Amazon Could Reshape E-Commerce Landscape
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250