Dewey trustee objects to proposed $165,000 bonus
Just when you thought Dewey & Leboeufs bankruptcy couldnt get any more contentious, the U.S. bankruptcy trustee in charge of the case objected Thursday to a plan that would reward the estates director of finance, Frank Canellas, with a $165,000 bonus.
October 01, 2012 at 09:50 AM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Just when you thought Dewey & Leboeuf's bankruptcy couldn't get any more contentious, the U.S. bankruptcy trustee in charge of the case objected Thursday to a plan that would reward the estate's director of finance, Frank Canellas, with a $165,000 bonus.
Joff Mitchell, the firm's chief restructuring officer, had proposed paying bonuses to Canellas and two other employees to keep them from leaving the firm. But U.S. Bankruptcy Trustee Tracy Hope Davis objected to Canellas' bonus, which was significantly larger than the other two, arguing that he was an “insider” in Dewey's former management team. According to Davis, under bankruptcy code insiders cannot receive bonuses unless they have a “bona fide job offer from another business at the same or greater rate of compensation.” She also noted that, with the bonus, Canellas stands to earn $665,000 in 2012, more than the $615,000 he made when the firm was still operational in 2011.
The firm's Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings have already seen one dust-up over bonuses. In July, a federal judge approved the firm's request to pay $700,000 in bonuses and retention pay to its remaining employees. Davis also objected to that plan, on the grounds that Dewey is no longer operating as a normal business, but Judge Martin Glenn disagreed, ruling that “the cost of the retention plan [was] reasonable in light of the possible consequences [Dewey] would face if it were unable to stop more employees from leaving.”
Read more at the Wall Street Journal and Thomson Reuters.
See below for more InsideCounsel stories about Dewey's demise:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
8 minute readWhy ACLU's New Legal Director Says It's a 'Good Time to Take the Reins'
'Utterly Bewildering': GCs Struggle to Grasp Scattershot Nature of Law Firm Rate Hikes
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250