7 of the strangest lawsuits making headlines
A mock sword fight goes awry, two superheroes join forces and five more strange lawsuits in the news
October 03, 2012 at 08:27 AM
12 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Radiation Rumble
They say good fences make good neighbors. Unfortunately for Arthur Firstenberg, fences can't keep out electromagnetic radiation. In 2010, Firstenberg sued his neighbor, Raphaela Monribot, for $1 million, claiming that her use of electronic equipment such as cellphones and wireless routers had caused him to suffer a disorder called electromagnetic stimulus (EMS) and forced him to leave his home. “Whenever I returned home, even for a few minutes, I felt the same sickness in my chest and my health was set back for days,” he claimed in court documents.
But when Firstenberg refused to submit to testing to examine his supposed pain, a district judge ruled that he had “failed to carry his burden of proof that the evidence he seeks to admit is scientifically reliable,” noting that several reliable studies have failed to prove any link between the electromagnetic radiation and EMS.
Tarnished Table
Scratching is never a good thing in billiards, especially when what you're scratching isn't the cue ball, but your $73,000 glass pool table. The owner of such a table is suing the maker, Nottage Design of Australia, claiming that his pricey purchase was “scuffed, scratched, damaged—essentially destroyed” after he played on it with standard pool balls.
According to the lawsuit, Nottage assured customers that the table's finish was “inherently scratch-resistant, so scratching through normal usage does not occur.” But after buying the table, the owner received a stack of shipping papers that included “an inconspicuous bullet point on a sheet of paper in a thin sealed envelope” informing users that only custom pool balls should be used on the surface. The buyer claims that this amounted to hiding the information, and is seeking $219,000 for the alleged deception.
Sword Shard
A quest for some Middle Ages flavor turned unexpectedly authentic for two South Dakota newlyweds, when a mock sword fight at a Medieval Times dinner theater allegedly left one of them blind. Dustin Wiseman and his wife Melissa, who were on their honeymoon at the time, say they were watching the fight from the front row at the company's Buena Park, Calif. location when a shard of metal from a titanium sword flew into Dustin's eye.
According to the couple's attorney, Wiseman has undergone at least three surgeries, but is still legally blind in his left eye. The pair is seeking $10 million from Medieval Times, arguing that it failed to properly protect its guests from injury.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Lawsuit Against Amazon Could Reshape E-Commerce Landscape
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250