Ellen Pao, Kleiner Perkins disagree on whether she’s been fired
This much is clear: Ellen Pao is leaving Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers.
October 04, 2012 at 07:52 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
This much is clear: Ellen Pao is leaving Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers. What isn't so apparent is whether the former investment partner was fired in retaliation for sexual harassment allegations, or whether she is transitioning out of the venture capital firm.
This week on the question-and-answer website Quora, Pao responded to a question about her employment status with the following post: “I have been terminated from my job at KPCB. On Monday afternoon, senior management told me to clean out my office, leave and not come back.”
But Kleiner Perkins denies that Pao's departure has anything to do with her sexual harassment allegations. In fact, the firm says, she hasn't even departed yet. “Because of long-standing issues having no relationship or bearing on the litigation, Kleiner Perkins approached Ms. Pao to facilitate her transition, over an extended period of time, out of the firm,” a firm spokesperson said in a statement.
Pao sued the venture capital firm for gender discrimination and retaliation in May, claiming that she was the victim of sexual harassment by former Kleiner Perkins investment partner Ajit Jazre, who left the firm last year. Pao's suit also detailed a broader pattern of discrimination, in which female employees were regularly passed over for promotions and excluded from firm events.
Her employer fired back with its own filing, arguing that Pao's poor performance, not her gender, had cost her promotions. It also maintained that Pao did not voice her discrimination allegations until late 2011, nearly five years after the harassment purportedly began.
Last July, a judge denied the firm's request to send the case to arbitration. Kleiner Perkins has appealed that ruling.
Read more at Thomson Reuters.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of sexual harassment cases, see:
This much is clear: Ellen Pao is leaving Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers. What isn't so apparent is whether the former investment partner was fired in retaliation for sexual harassment allegations, or whether she is transitioning out of the venture capital firm.
This week on the question-and-answer website Quora, Pao responded to a question about her employment status with the following post: “I have been terminated from my job at KPCB. On Monday afternoon, senior management told me to clean out my office, leave and not come back.”
But Kleiner Perkins denies that Pao's departure has anything to do with her sexual harassment allegations. In fact, the firm says, she hasn't even departed yet. “Because of long-standing issues having no relationship or bearing on the litigation, Kleiner Perkins approached Ms. Pao to facilitate her transition, over an extended period of time, out of the firm,” a firm spokesperson said in a statement.
Pao sued the venture capital firm for gender discrimination and retaliation in May, claiming that she was the victim of sexual harassment by former Kleiner Perkins investment partner Ajit Jazre, who left the firm last year. Pao's suit also detailed a broader pattern of discrimination, in which female employees were regularly passed over for promotions and excluded from firm events.
Her employer fired back with its own filing, arguing that Pao's poor performance, not her gender, had cost her promotions. It also maintained that Pao did not voice her discrimination allegations until late 2011, nearly five years after the harassment purportedly began.
Last July, a judge denied the firm's request to send the case to arbitration. Kleiner Perkins has appealed that ruling.
Read more at Thomson Reuters.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of sexual harassment cases, see:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Lawsuit Against Amazon Could Reshape E-Commerce Landscape
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250