Google, publishers agree to e-book settlement
Google Inc. has finally reached a settlement with the Association of American Publishers (AAP), which sued the search engine giant for copying millions of books for its digital library.
October 05, 2012 at 07:57 AM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Google Inc. has finally reached a settlement with the Association of American Publishers (AAP), which sued the search engine giant for copying millions of books for its digital library.
The suit dates back to 2005, when The Authors Guild and the AAP sued Google. The plaintiffs said that when Google—in partnership with libraries such as the New York Library and Stanford University Libraries—made around 20 million electronic copies of books for its digital library, it violated their copyrights.
The parties spent years in litigation, and in 2008 they reached a $125 million settlement agreement to pay authors and publishers whose copyrights had been violated. The Department of Justice (DOJ), however, invalidated that agreement, claiming it was illegal—and last year a federal court agreed with the DOJ.
Under this recent settlement with AAP, Google agreed that publishers may decide whether they want their books made available on Google's digital library. The publishers will also get a percentage of consumer's purchases from the library.
Google isn't in the free-and-clear just yet. The Authors Guild said it will continue its fight against Google over the digital library. “Google continues to profit from its use of millions of copyright-protected books without regard to authors' rights, and our class-action lawsuit on behalf of U.S. authors continues,” Paul Aiken, executive director of the Authors Guild, said in a statement.
Separately, Google is still fighting accusations the DOJ has made against it regarding price-fixing of e-books.
Read more about this settlement on Thomson Reuters and the Wall Street Journal.
Read more InsideCounsel stories related to Google's e-books litigation:
Authors sue Google over book digitization project
Google in talks with authors, publishers
Google gets two months to finalize Google Books
Also, see other InsideCounsel stories about the ongoing legal battles over digital books:
Apple and e-book publishers offer proposed settlement with EU
Chinese writers win copyright battle against search engine Baidu
Romance novel authors sue over royalties
Barnes & Noble objects to e-book settlement
Apple takes on suits over e-books and Siri
Apple rejects DOJ charge of e-book price collusion
The suit dates back to 2005, when The Authors Guild and the AAP sued
The parties spent years in litigation, and in 2008 they reached a $125 million settlement agreement to pay authors and publishers whose copyrights had been violated. The Department of Justice (DOJ), however, invalidated that agreement, claiming it was illegal—and last year a federal court agreed with the DOJ.
Under this recent settlement with AAP,
Separately,
Read more about this settlement on Thomson Reuters and the Wall Street Journal.
Read more InsideCounsel stories related to
Authors sue
Also, see other InsideCounsel stories about the ongoing legal battles over digital books:
Chinese writers win copyright battle against search engine Baidu
Romance novel authors sue over royalties
Barnes & Noble objects to e-book settlement
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Recent Controversial Decision and Insurance Law May Mitigate Exposure for Companies Subject to False Claims Act Lawsuits
7 minute read
Trending Stories
- 1Eliminating Judicial Exceptions: The Promise of the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act
- 2AI in Legal: Disruptive Potential and Practical Realities
- 3One Court’s Opinion on Successfully Bankruptcy Proofing a Borrower
- 4Making the Case for Workflow Automation
- 5Copyright Infringement by Generative AI Tools Under US and UK Law: Common Threads and Contrasting Approaches
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
