Obamacare faces another lawsuit over contraception coverage
The Supreme Court upheld the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) in June, but that hasnt stopped several employers from challenging the laws insurance mandate on religious grounds.
October 09, 2012 at 08:35 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The Supreme Court upheld the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) in June, but that hasn't stopped several employers from challenging the law's insurance mandate on religious grounds.
The latest plaintiff to sue the federal government over the law is John Kennedy, president and CEO of Michigan manufacturing companies Autocam and Autocam Medical, who says that his Catholic beliefs prevent him from including coverage of contraception and abortion-inducing drugs in his company's insurance plan.
In a video posted on YouTube, Kennedy says that, although he respects the PPACA's goals, he “can't, in good conscience, choose between violating my beliefs and meeting my [workers'] needs.” If Kennedy refuses to cover drugs such as the so-called “morning-after pill,” he would face annual fines of $24 million, according to his lawsuit.
The lawsuit argues that “as a result of [their] sincerely held religious beliefs plaintiffs cannot provide, facilitate access to, subsidize or cooperate with the provision of drugs or services that facilitate contraception…or sterilization, because to do so would be cooperation with practices they sincerely believe to be gravely wrong.”
The complaint names several U.S. Cabinet members as defendants, including Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius, Labor Secretary Hilda Solis and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner. Kennedy is seeking a declaration that the law violates his rights, and preliminary and permanent injunctions preventing the government from implementing the PPACA's mandate.
Read more at Mlive.com.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of the health care law, see:
Hobby Lobby sues not to cover morning-after pill
Your Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to-do list
Supreme Court allows Obamacare to stand
Supreme Court divided on second day of health care hearings
The Supreme Court upheld the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) in June, but that hasn't stopped several employers from challenging the law's insurance mandate on religious grounds.
The latest plaintiff to sue the federal government over the law is John Kennedy, president and CEO of Michigan manufacturing companies Autocam and Autocam Medical, who says that his Catholic beliefs prevent him from including coverage of contraception and abortion-inducing drugs in his company's insurance plan.
In a video posted on YouTube, Kennedy says that, although he respects the PPACA's goals, he “can't, in good conscience, choose between violating my beliefs and meeting my [workers'] needs.” If Kennedy refuses to cover drugs such as the so-called “morning-after pill,” he would face annual fines of $24 million, according to his lawsuit.
The lawsuit argues that “as a result of [their] sincerely held religious beliefs plaintiffs cannot provide, facilitate access to, subsidize or cooperate with the provision of drugs or services that facilitate contraception…or sterilization, because to do so would be cooperation with practices they sincerely believe to be gravely wrong.”
The complaint names several U.S. Cabinet members as defendants, including Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius, Labor Secretary Hilda Solis and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner. Kennedy is seeking a declaration that the law violates his rights, and preliminary and permanent injunctions preventing the government from implementing the PPACA's mandate.
Read more at Mlive.com.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of the health care law, see:
Hobby Lobby sues not to cover morning-after pill
Your Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to-do list
Supreme Court allows Obamacare to stand
Supreme Court divided on second day of health care hearings
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Recent Controversial Decision and Insurance Law May Mitigate Exposure for Companies Subject to False Claims Act Lawsuits
7 minute read
Trending Stories
- 1We Must Uphold the Rights of Immigrant Students
- 2Orrick Picks Up 13-Lawyer Tech, VC Group From Gunderson Dettmer
- 3How Alzheimer’s and Other Cognitive Diseases Affect Guardianship, POAs and Estate Planning
- 4How Lower Courts Are Interpreting Justices' Decision in 'Muldrow v. City of St. Louis'
- 5Phantom Income/Retained Earnings and the Potential for Inflated Support
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
