Obamacare faces another lawsuit over contraception coverage
The Supreme Court upheld the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) in June, but that hasnt stopped several employers from challenging the laws insurance mandate on religious grounds.
October 09, 2012 at 08:35 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The Supreme Court upheld the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) in June, but that hasn't stopped several employers from challenging the law's insurance mandate on religious grounds.
The latest plaintiff to sue the federal government over the law is John Kennedy, president and CEO of Michigan manufacturing companies Autocam and Autocam Medical, who says that his Catholic beliefs prevent him from including coverage of contraception and abortion-inducing drugs in his company's insurance plan.
In a video posted on YouTube, Kennedy says that, although he respects the PPACA's goals, he “can't, in good conscience, choose between violating my beliefs and meeting my [workers'] needs.” If Kennedy refuses to cover drugs such as the so-called “morning-after pill,” he would face annual fines of $24 million, according to his lawsuit.
The lawsuit argues that “as a result of [their] sincerely held religious beliefs plaintiffs cannot provide, facilitate access to, subsidize or cooperate with the provision of drugs or services that facilitate contraception…or sterilization, because to do so would be cooperation with practices they sincerely believe to be gravely wrong.”
The complaint names several U.S. Cabinet members as defendants, including Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius, Labor Secretary Hilda Solis and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner. Kennedy is seeking a declaration that the law violates his rights, and preliminary and permanent injunctions preventing the government from implementing the PPACA's mandate.
Read more at Mlive.com.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of the health care law, see:
The Supreme Court upheld the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) in June, but that hasn't stopped several employers from challenging the law's insurance mandate on religious grounds.
The latest plaintiff to sue the federal government over the law is John Kennedy, president and CEO of Michigan manufacturing companies Autocam and Autocam Medical, who says that his Catholic beliefs prevent him from including coverage of contraception and abortion-inducing drugs in his company's insurance plan.
In a video posted on YouTube, Kennedy says that, although he respects the PPACA's goals, he “can't, in good conscience, choose between violating my beliefs and meeting my [workers'] needs.” If Kennedy refuses to cover drugs such as the so-called “morning-after pill,” he would face annual fines of $24 million, according to his lawsuit.
The lawsuit argues that “as a result of [their] sincerely held religious beliefs plaintiffs cannot provide, facilitate access to, subsidize or cooperate with the provision of drugs or services that facilitate contraception…or sterilization, because to do so would be cooperation with practices they sincerely believe to be gravely wrong.”
The complaint names several U.S. Cabinet members as defendants, including Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius, Labor Secretary Hilda Solis and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner. Kennedy is seeking a declaration that the law violates his rights, and preliminary and permanent injunctions preventing the government from implementing the PPACA's mandate.
Read more at Mlive.com.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of the health care law, see:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Lawsuit Against Amazon Could Reshape E-Commerce Landscape
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-68
- 2Friday Newspaper
- 3Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 4Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 5NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250