Beverage industry groups sue to block NYC sugary drink ban
Members of the beverage and restaurant industries filed a lawsuit Friday challenging New York Citys impending ban on sugary drinks, arguing that Mayor Michael Bloombergs Board of Health does not have the authority to pass the measure.
October 15, 2012 at 07:45 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Members of the beverage and restaurant industries filed a lawsuit Friday challenging New York City's impending ban on sugary drinks, arguing that Mayor Michael Bloomberg's Board of Health does not have the authority to pass the measure.
The plaintiffs, including the National Restaurant Association and the American Beverage Association, argue that only the city council—which is a legislative, rather than executive, body—has the authority to approve the law. “This case is not about obesity in New York City,” the lawsuit says. “This case is about the Board of Health, appointed by the mayor, bypassing the proper legislative process for governing the city.”
The city's Board of Health voted in September to approve the measure, which is scheduled to take effect on March 12, 2013. The ban will prohibit businesses such as restaurants, delis, movie theaters and stadiums from selling sodas or sugary drinks larger than 16 ounces. Bloomberg argues that the legislation will help to curb NYC's escalating obesity rates. According to the city, 58 percent of NYC's adults and almost 40 percent of its public school students are overweight or obese.
Critics of the measure say that it infringes on personal freedom and could harm small businesses. They also note that the ban contains many loopholes and exceptions: Customers can still buy oversized drinks in convenience stores and supermarkets. Diet sodas and alcohol- and milk-based beverages are exempt from the law. And consumers determined to skirt the ban can simply buy two 16-ounce beverages instead of one 32-ounce drink.
These arguments notwithstanding, some experts predict that businesses will have a difficult time mounting legal challenges to the legislation, as the health department has the power to regulate NYC restaurants and other eateries. Bloomberg himself has already passed several high-profile public health measures during his 11-year tenure as mayor, including a ban on smoking in most public places and a measure outlawing the use of trans fats in restaurants.
Read more at Thomson Reuters.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of beverage-related lawsuits, see:
Members of the beverage and restaurant industries filed a lawsuit Friday challenging
The plaintiffs, including the National Restaurant Association and the American Beverage Association, argue that only the city council—which is a legislative, rather than executive, body—has the authority to approve the law. “This case is not about obesity in
The city's Board of Health voted in September to approve the measure, which is scheduled to take effect on March 12, 2013. The ban will prohibit businesses such as restaurants, delis, movie theaters and stadiums from selling sodas or sugary drinks larger than 16 ounces. Bloomberg argues that the legislation will help to curb NYC's escalating obesity rates. According to the city, 58 percent of NYC's adults and almost 40 percent of its public school students are overweight or obese.
Critics of the measure say that it infringes on personal freedom and could harm small businesses. They also note that the ban contains many loopholes and exceptions: Customers can still buy oversized drinks in convenience stores and supermarkets. Diet sodas and alcohol- and milk-based beverages are exempt from the law. And consumers determined to skirt the ban can simply buy two 16-ounce beverages instead of one 32-ounce drink.
These arguments notwithstanding, some experts predict that businesses will have a difficult time mounting legal challenges to the legislation, as the health department has the power to regulate NYC restaurants and other eateries. Bloomberg himself has already passed several high-profile public health measures during his 11-year tenure as mayor, including a ban on smoking in most public places and a measure outlawing the use of trans fats in restaurants.
Read more at Thomson Reuters.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of beverage-related lawsuits, see:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Lawsuit Against Amazon Could Reshape E-Commerce Landscape
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250