YSL seeks to dismiss counterclaims against Louboutin
French luxury fashion house Yves Saint Laurent (YSL) wants to end its dispute with Paris-based shoe designer Christian Louboutin and his company, Louboutin SA, once and for all.
October 17, 2012 at 06:36 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
French luxury fashion house Yves Saint Laurent (YSL) wants to end its dispute with Paris-based shoe designer Christian Louboutin and his company, Louboutin SA, once and for all.
Louboutin sued YSL in April 2011, claiming YSL's all-red shoes infringed Louboutin's famous red-soled shoes, which the company began selling in 1992 and patented in 2008. In September, the 2nd Circuit found that Louboutin is entitled to trademark protection for its red-soled shoes but only has the right to trademark red soles that contrast with the rest of the shoe, meaning YSL can continue selling its monochromatic shoes. The 2nd Circuit remanded the case back to the district court for more proceedings, including consideration and counterclaims from YSL.
But in a filing yesterday, YSL asked a federal judge to dismiss its remaining counterclaims against Louboutin in their epic battle over the right to the color red. YSL is asking the judge to dismiss the six counterclaims without prejudice, meaning the company could bring the same claims in the future.
“Now that the Court of Appeals has definitively ruled for Yves Saint Laurent and has dismissed Christian Louboutin's claims, Yves Saint Laurent has decided to end what was left of the litigation and refocus its energies on its business and its creative designs,” YSL said in a statement. “By dismissing the case now, Yves Saint Laurent also wishes to ensure that the court will not make any further rulings that put at risk the ability of fashion designers to trademark color in appropriate cases.”
Read Bloomberg Businessweek for more information about the footwear fiasco.
For more fashion-related legal news, read:
Louis Vuitton loses lawsuit over knockoff handbag in “The Hangover: Part II”
Gucci wins trademark infringement cases against Guess
Betsey Johnson files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
Counterfeit Louis Vuitton handbags infringe company's IP
Designers score decisive victory
French luxury fashion house Yves Saint Laurent (YSL) wants to end its dispute with Paris-based shoe designer Christian Louboutin and his company, Louboutin SA, once and for all.
Louboutin sued YSL in April 2011, claiming YSL's all-red shoes infringed Louboutin's famous red-soled shoes, which the company began selling in 1992 and patented in 2008. In September, the 2nd Circuit found that Louboutin is entitled to trademark protection for its red-soled shoes but only has the right to trademark red soles that contrast with the rest of the shoe, meaning YSL can continue selling its monochromatic shoes. The 2nd Circuit remanded the case back to the district court for more proceedings, including consideration and counterclaims from YSL.
But in a filing yesterday, YSL asked a federal judge to dismiss its remaining counterclaims against Louboutin in their epic battle over the right to the color red. YSL is asking the judge to dismiss the six counterclaims without prejudice, meaning the company could bring the same claims in the future.
“Now that the Court of Appeals has definitively ruled for Yves Saint Laurent and has dismissed Christian Louboutin's claims, Yves Saint Laurent has decided to end what was left of the litigation and refocus its energies on its business and its creative designs,” YSL said in a statement. “By dismissing the case now, Yves Saint Laurent also wishes to ensure that the court will not make any further rulings that put at risk the ability of fashion designers to trademark color in appropriate cases.”
Read Bloomberg Businessweek for more information about the footwear fiasco.
For more fashion-related legal news, read:
Louis Vuitton loses lawsuit over knockoff handbag in “The Hangover: Part II”
Gucci wins trademark infringement cases against Guess
Betsey Johnson files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Recent Controversial Decision and Insurance Law May Mitigate Exposure for Companies Subject to False Claims Act Lawsuits
7 minute read
Trending Stories
- 1Parties’ Reservation of Rights Defeats Attempt to Enforce Settlement in Principle
- 2ACC CLO Survey Waves Warning Flags for Boards
- 3States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 4Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 5Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
