5 tips for using inside counsel freelancers
Law department talent models continue to evolve in response to the question so often posed at inside counsel conferences: How can general counsel handle increasing compliance requirements and other legal needs, while meeting stricter budgetary goals?
October 18, 2012 at 04:30 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Law department talent models continue to evolve in response to the question so often posed at inside counsel conferences: “How can general counsel handle increasing compliance requirements and other legal needs, while meeting stricter budgetary goals?” Some experts offer process- and technology-oriented solutions. And plenty of discussion focuses on improving outside counsel relationships.
Nonetheless, general counsel tell me that, bottom line, the question above leads to this simple math result: more work + budget caps = work overload for their core team of inside counsel. Yet, the reality at many law departments is static headcount. Attorneys who retire or depart are indeed replaced, but companies remain incredibly resistant to actually adding staff.
With inside counsel therefore pushed to their productivity limits, and use of outside counsel curbed by budgetary concerns, general counsel are incorporating freelance attorneys into the mix. The evolving law department talent model has many different looks. Companies are using freelancers, both on-site and off-site, via new model recruiting firms, as well as directly engaging independents with valuable subject matter expertise. If found via a third-party source, most freelancers are W2 employees of the outside firm, not independent contractors.
The talent model is now essentially a core team of inside counsel, plus an elastic roster of high-quality supplemental attorneys who add muscle as needed to the law department. The economics make sense when companies use freelancers as an alternative to calling outside counsel.
Here is a best practices guide to making this talent model work.
- Follow the money. General counsel worry that good freelance talent won't remain available as needed. Shoot for what I call Goldilocks rates (“just right,” not law firm high and not contract attorney low). When freelancers are paid in line with in-house compensation, they value the work and are much more likely to maintain an ongoing relationship.
- Treat freelancers like one happy family. Give freelancers @yourcompany.com email addresses. Include them whenever possible in department meetings. Introduce them to internal clients as adjunct members of the law department, and not as outsiders. Use confidentiality agreements to mitigate any risks associated with truly incorporating an off-payroll team member.
- Find a key reference or trusted source. Incorporating new attorneys poses some discomfort until they back up resume credentials with actual performance. The best practice here is no different than when choosing outside counsel. Do some due diligence, check a freelancer's references or use a third-party talent provider with a track record of successfully serving law departments.
- Differentiate between freelancers and job seekers. Many excellent freelancers are inside counsel who would really prefer a more traditional job. These attorneys are best used for gap fill needs and short-term projects. A true freelancer prefers a flexible, off-payroll role and is therefore much more likely to be available for recurring needs over a period of years versus just months. Both kinds of supplemental attorneys are valuable, but it's important to understand expectations and commitment levels up front.
- Establish a bi-weekly scheduled check-in. Appoint a core in-house team member to be the primary supervising contact with each freelancer. A 30-minute scheduled call with the freelancer, especially if the work is being performed off-site, is very helpful in keeping expectations aligned and projects on-track. I recommend a bi-weekly call, but the main point is to maintain a formal touch base schedule.
Next month, I will stay on this topic generally, but with a focus on the flip side of the freelancer coin: advice for inside counsel who may be considering freelance work as a long-term career choice, and not just to fill a gap in the middle of a traditional job search.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhite Castle GC Becomes Chain's First President From Outside Family
Beyond the Title: Developing a Personal Brand as General Counsel
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250