Alleged Broadway fraud involved bogus investors and a faked death
Truth was much, much stranger than fiction for the producers trying to mount a Broadway production based on the novel Rebecca, according to a $100 million fraud lawsuit they filed Friday.
October 22, 2012 at 07:52 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Truth was much, much stranger than fiction for the producers trying to mount a Broadway production based on the novel “Rebecca,” according to a $100 million fraud lawsuit they filed Friday.
While trying to assemble funding for “Rebecca”—a musical version of the 1938 mystery novel by Daphne du Maurier—producers Ben Sprecher and Louise Forlenza were introduced to Mark Hotton, a Long Island stockbroker who agreed to help them find investors. Within several months, Hotton returned with the names of four overseas investors, each of whom pledged to contribute between $500,000 and $2 million to the production.
According to the producers' suit, “Hotton made up the names, dates of birth, home addresses, email addresses, telephone numbers and signatures of the purported investors,” even going to far as to create websites associated with the fictitious contributors.
Just after the musical's funding deadline, however, Hotton allegedly told the producers that the largest investor, “Paul Abrams,” had died of malaria, and that the other investors were withdrawing their funds as a result.
And the story doesn't end there: Several months after the four fictional investors had dropped out of the production, Sprecher and Forlenza say they found another (real) investor interested in pledging $2,250,000 to the musical. Within weeks, however, the angel investor withdrew from the agreement, after receiving a series of emails from a fictional sender who warned him that the musical was in trouble.
In these emails, the anonymous individual—Hotton, according to the lawsuit—wrote that “with [the] prospect of fraud, an ongoing money shortage, a bad public perception, anemic ticket sales, and a rabid press corps, the only good reason to invest in rebecca [sic] would be for a tax-write-off and a desire to be dragged intoa [sic] fraud trial.”
As a result of the alleged scam, “Rebecca” has been postponed indefinitely. If the musical does not open, Sprecher and Forlenza's company will be liable for $7 million.
Last week, investigators arrested Hotton and his wife Sherri Hotton, on charges of wire fraud and money laundering. According to the Wall Street Journal, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, which has been investigating Hotton since 2009, reports that the stockbroker has been the subject of 12 complaints and arbitration cases.
Read more at Thomson Reuters.
For more entertainment-related lawsuits, see:
5 celebrity lawsuits in the news
Spider-Man director sues Broadway show's producers
Man sues AMC Theaters over high-priced snacks
Racial discrimination case against “The Bachelor” dismissed
MGM settles suit over “Raging Bull”
Oscar-nominated actor sues Lionsgate Entertainment
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Recent Controversial Decision and Insurance Law May Mitigate Exposure for Companies Subject to False Claims Act Lawsuits Recent Controversial Decision and Insurance Law May Mitigate Exposure for Companies Subject to False Claims Act Lawsuits](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/fd/84/3d7fb4d146d38b97cfab7af5b7c7/inside-feature-767x633-2.jpg)
Recent Controversial Decision and Insurance Law May Mitigate Exposure for Companies Subject to False Claims Act Lawsuits
7 minute read![Varsity Brands Lures Aboard Keurig Dr. Pepper Legal Chief Varsity Brands Lures Aboard Keurig Dr. Pepper Legal Chief](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/83/dc/a59e06ad42be872191fe7a086901/cheerleaders-767x633.jpg)
![Hasbro Faces Shareholder Ire Over 'Excessive' Toy, Game Inventory Hasbro Faces Shareholder Ire Over 'Excessive' Toy, Game Inventory](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/68/d7/ef03ff8a4ced831763f57095d82f/hasbro-767x633.jpg)
![CLOs Face Mounting Pressure as Risks Mushroom and Job Duties Expand CLOs Face Mounting Pressure as Risks Mushroom and Job Duties Expand](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/corpcounsel/contrib/content/uploads/sites/390/2023/10/Businessman-juggling-business-icons-767x633.jpg)
Trending Stories
- 1ACC CLO Survey Waves Warning Flags for Boards
- 2States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 3Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 4Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 5Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250