Growing trend: GCs serving on corporate boards
Yesterday, lawyers gathered at Sidley Austins Chicago office to learn more about the opportunities, issues and best practices related to serving as board members of public and private companies.
October 24, 2012 at 03:15 AM
11 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Yesterday, lawyers gathered at Sidley Austin's Chicago office to learn more about the opportunities, issues and best practices related to serving as board members of public and private companies.
The law firm partnered with the legal search consultancy Major, Lindsey & Africa and the executive search firm Diversity in Boardrooms to host an invitation-only panel discussion titled “General Counsel on Corporate Boards: Opportunities and Best Practices.”
Cindy Burrell, president of Diversity in Boardrooms, moderated the panel, which included Sidley Austin Partner John Sabl; Paul Williams, Chicago office managing partner at Major, Lindsey & Africa; and Sara Hays, principal of SLH Advisors. Each panelist was formerly a general counsel and now serves on multiple boards.
The discussion focused on a recent trend. “There is an increase in the number of lawyers—specifically general counsel—on boards,” Williams said. For instance, he noted, Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. recently named General Mills Inc. GC Roderick Palmore to its board of directors.
Sabl said regulated industries and companies that have had compliance problems are particularly interested in having lawyers on their boards. “Companies that are thinking globally about what they need want lawyers on their boards,” he said. Additionally, he noted that there's a need for more in-house lawyers to assume board positions as companies continue to encounter issues involving the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Some of the skills boards routinely look for, according to Burrell, include leadership capabilities, ability to build consensus, integrity, ability to follow through on commitments and relationship-forming skills. Hays said GCs offer all those benefits and more—including analytical skills, knowledge of regulations and risk-management experience—to boards, which makes them ideal candidates. They key to landing a position, she said, is networking and letting your contacts know you're interested in joining a board of directors.
Panelists noted that the interview process for board positions is vastly different than the process for regular jobs. For one thing, the process is much longer and can include one-on-one chats with executives and board members as well as formal panel interviews. Hays said GCs interviewing for board positions should research the prospective companies, focus on what they can add to the boardroom and tell board members how they will provide strategic oversight. Preparation, perseverance and patience are critical, she said. Williams added that GCs must reformulate their resumes to be shorter and structured to show the value they'd bring to their prospective boards.
There are a variety of concerns to consider before accepting a board position, panelists said. Williams noted that GCs should consider a company's culture, dynamics, risk calibration and tone at the top before joining a board. Sabl added that GCs also must ask themselves whether they're willing to commit 5 percent to 10 percent of their time to their board duties. “Make sure it is a company where you could play a meaningful role as a director,” he said.
For more insight about how GCs are interacting with boards, read “General counsel's heightened influence in the boardroom.”
Yesterday, lawyers gathered at
The law firm partnered with the legal search consultancy Major, Lindsey & Africa and the executive search firm Diversity in Boardrooms to host an invitation-only panel discussion titled “General Counsel on Corporate Boards: Opportunities and Best Practices.”
Cindy Burrell, president of Diversity in Boardrooms, moderated the panel, which included
The discussion focused on a recent trend. “There is an increase in the number of lawyers—specifically general counsel—on boards,” Williams said. For instance, he noted,
Sabl said regulated industries and companies that have had compliance problems are particularly interested in having lawyers on their boards. “Companies that are thinking globally about what they need want lawyers on their boards,” he said. Additionally, he noted that there's a need for more in-house lawyers to assume board positions as companies continue to encounter issues involving the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Some of the skills boards routinely look for, according to Burrell, include leadership capabilities, ability to build consensus, integrity, ability to follow through on commitments and relationship-forming skills. Hays said GCs offer all those benefits and more—including analytical skills, knowledge of regulations and risk-management experience—to boards, which makes them ideal candidates. They key to landing a position, she said, is networking and letting your contacts know you're interested in joining a board of directors.
Panelists noted that the interview process for board positions is vastly different than the process for regular jobs. For one thing, the process is much longer and can include one-on-one chats with executives and board members as well as formal panel interviews. Hays said GCs interviewing for board positions should research the prospective companies, focus on what they can add to the boardroom and tell board members how they will provide strategic oversight. Preparation, perseverance and patience are critical, she said. Williams added that GCs must reformulate their resumes to be shorter and structured to show the value they'd bring to their prospective boards.
There are a variety of concerns to consider before accepting a board position, panelists said. Williams noted that GCs should consider a company's culture, dynamics, risk calibration and tone at the top before joining a board. Sabl added that GCs also must ask themselves whether they're willing to commit 5 percent to 10 percent of their time to their board duties. “Make sure it is a company where you could play a meaningful role as a director,” he said.
For more insight about how GCs are interacting with boards, read “General counsel's heightened influence in the boardroom.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBeyond the Title: Developing a Personal Brand as General Counsel
Step 1 for Successful Negotiators: Believe in Yourself
Deluge of Trump-Leery Government Lawyers Join Job Market, Setting Up Free-for-All for Law Firm, In-House Openings
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Tuesday Newspaper
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-85
- 3Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 4Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 5Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250