Growing trend: GCs serving on corporate boards
Yesterday, lawyers gathered at Sidley Austins Chicago office to learn more about the opportunities, issues and best practices related to serving as board members of public and private companies.
October 24, 2012 at 03:15 AM
11 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Yesterday, lawyers gathered at Sidley Austin's Chicago office to learn more about the opportunities, issues and best practices related to serving as board members of public and private companies.
The law firm partnered with the legal search consultancy Major, Lindsey & Africa and the executive search firm Diversity in Boardrooms to host an invitation-only panel discussion titled “General Counsel on Corporate Boards: Opportunities and Best Practices.”
Cindy Burrell, president of Diversity in Boardrooms, moderated the panel, which included Sidley Austin Partner John Sabl; Paul Williams, Chicago office managing partner at Major, Lindsey & Africa; and Sara Hays, principal of SLH Advisors. Each panelist was formerly a general counsel and now serves on multiple boards.
The discussion focused on a recent trend. “There is an increase in the number of lawyers—specifically general counsel—on boards,” Williams said. For instance, he noted, Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. recently named General Mills Inc. GC Roderick Palmore to its board of directors.
Sabl said regulated industries and companies that have had compliance problems are particularly interested in having lawyers on their boards. “Companies that are thinking globally about what they need want lawyers on their boards,” he said. Additionally, he noted that there's a need for more in-house lawyers to assume board positions as companies continue to encounter issues involving the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Some of the skills boards routinely look for, according to Burrell, include leadership capabilities, ability to build consensus, integrity, ability to follow through on commitments and relationship-forming skills. Hays said GCs offer all those benefits and more—including analytical skills, knowledge of regulations and risk-management experience—to boards, which makes them ideal candidates. They key to landing a position, she said, is networking and letting your contacts know you're interested in joining a board of directors.
Panelists noted that the interview process for board positions is vastly different than the process for regular jobs. For one thing, the process is much longer and can include one-on-one chats with executives and board members as well as formal panel interviews. Hays said GCs interviewing for board positions should research the prospective companies, focus on what they can add to the boardroom and tell board members how they will provide strategic oversight. Preparation, perseverance and patience are critical, she said. Williams added that GCs must reformulate their resumes to be shorter and structured to show the value they'd bring to their prospective boards.
There are a variety of concerns to consider before accepting a board position, panelists said. Williams noted that GCs should consider a company's culture, dynamics, risk calibration and tone at the top before joining a board. Sabl added that GCs also must ask themselves whether they're willing to commit 5 percent to 10 percent of their time to their board duties. “Make sure it is a company where you could play a meaningful role as a director,” he said.
For more insight about how GCs are interacting with boards, read “General counsel's heightened influence in the boardroom.”
Yesterday, lawyers gathered at
The law firm partnered with the legal search consultancy Major, Lindsey & Africa and the executive search firm Diversity in Boardrooms to host an invitation-only panel discussion titled “General Counsel on Corporate Boards: Opportunities and Best Practices.”
Cindy Burrell, president of Diversity in Boardrooms, moderated the panel, which included
The discussion focused on a recent trend. “There is an increase in the number of lawyers—specifically general counsel—on boards,” Williams said. For instance, he noted,
Sabl said regulated industries and companies that have had compliance problems are particularly interested in having lawyers on their boards. “Companies that are thinking globally about what they need want lawyers on their boards,” he said. Additionally, he noted that there's a need for more in-house lawyers to assume board positions as companies continue to encounter issues involving the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Some of the skills boards routinely look for, according to Burrell, include leadership capabilities, ability to build consensus, integrity, ability to follow through on commitments and relationship-forming skills. Hays said GCs offer all those benefits and more—including analytical skills, knowledge of regulations and risk-management experience—to boards, which makes them ideal candidates. They key to landing a position, she said, is networking and letting your contacts know you're interested in joining a board of directors.
Panelists noted that the interview process for board positions is vastly different than the process for regular jobs. For one thing, the process is much longer and can include one-on-one chats with executives and board members as well as formal panel interviews. Hays said GCs interviewing for board positions should research the prospective companies, focus on what they can add to the boardroom and tell board members how they will provide strategic oversight. Preparation, perseverance and patience are critical, she said. Williams added that GCs must reformulate their resumes to be shorter and structured to show the value they'd bring to their prospective boards.
There are a variety of concerns to consider before accepting a board position, panelists said. Williams noted that GCs should consider a company's culture, dynamics, risk calibration and tone at the top before joining a board. Sabl added that GCs also must ask themselves whether they're willing to commit 5 percent to 10 percent of their time to their board duties. “Make sure it is a company where you could play a meaningful role as a director,” he said.
For more insight about how GCs are interacting with boards, read “General counsel's heightened influence in the boardroom.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInside Track: Why Relentless Self-Promoters Need Not Apply for GC Posts
Companies' Obsession With Soft Skills Has Made Prized GC Posts Even Harder to Land
4 minute readMeta Workers Aren't of One Mind on Company's Retreat From DEI, Fact-Checking
Private Equity-Backed Medical Imaging Chain Hires CLO, Continuing C-Suite Makeover
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250