Cheat Sheet: A quick guide to doing business in China
It has the second largest economy in the world, the largest population and the fastest-growing market of any country. Businesses would be foolish to ignore it.
November 01, 2012 at 05:30 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
It has the second largest economy in the world, the largest population and the fastest-growing market of any country. Businesses would be foolish to ignore it. “Any company that wants to be global has to be in China,” says Newegg Inc. Chief Legal Officer Lee Cheng.
But it would also be foolish to head in unprepared. Our November cover story provides in-house counsel with the information they need to succeed in China, updating our 2006 China report with the many changes the country has undergone in the past six years.
This Cheat Sheet will provide you with a quick and dirty version of our cover story, condensing it into a five-minute crash course on doing business in China. For the full version, click here.
Business Basics
While it's easier now to break into China's market than it was 10 years ago, the government still plays a large role in controlling business within the country. Expect to have to seek government approval at just about every turn, and find a local lawyer to help you understand the country's evolving regulations.
But don't forget about U.S. regulations, either. Especially the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Personal relationships are very important in the Chinese business community—“as important as any written document or contract,” says Christian Na, deputy general counsel of Circor International Inc—and such ties can be easily abused or interpreted as bribery. Make sure to keep your relationships on the legitimate side of the law.
Changing Courts
China has a civil law system, meaning it isn't bound by stare decisis, the rule that says lower courts must rely on judicial precedent. However, the country is trying to push for more uniform decision-making among its courts. The Supreme People's Court of China has published several “guiding cases,” meant to show other courts examples of “sound judicial decision-making,” Hogan Lovells Partner Song Zhu says.
While these guiding cases have so far not been relevant to foreign businesses, the next batch is expected to include an intellectual property case. IP is an issue that foreign companies should keep their eye on when operating in China, as you'll see on the next page.
Improving IP
China is trying to move away from its image as a manufacturing mecca, and promote indigenous innovation. It's working, too. The country had the most patent applications in the world in 2011—1.63 million. Unfortunately, this indigenous innovation sometimes amounts to “tweaking” foreign technology, leaving some companies worried about protecting their IP in China.
The good news is that China recently closed a loophole in its law that used to allow applicants to receive Chinese patents on inventions that were already patented elsewhere in the world. Even so, King & Wood Mallesons Partner Alex Zhang recommends being quick to enforce IP rights, and employing a lawyer who can read and write Chinese to check contracts for any IP trickery from businesses whose practices have yet to catch up with the country's laws.
Employment Environment
Experts told us that Chinese worker rights have been steadily improving over the past six years, perhaps thanks to the Labor Contract Law, which went into effect on Jan. 1, 2008. The law requires written contracts and overtime pay, among other provisions that drive up costs for employers, but Ricardo Ernst, a professor of global logistics at Georgetown University says it's not all bad. Having contracts makes company policies more easily enforceable.
“Requiring contracts is a very good idea,” Ernst says. “The transparency of rules is, at the end of the day, what brings success.”
One thing employers don't really have to worry about is unions. Despite media reports after an outbreak of labor strikes in 2010 that said the All-China Federation of Trade Unions was going to start advocating for workers more, Dan Harris, a partner at Harris & Moure and author of the firm's China Law Blog, says that the unions really don't have teeth.
“There's no real union. It's the government that's telling them what to do and when,” Harris says. “This whole thing about [how] they're going to advocate for the workers and all that? Bull.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom Reluctant Lawyer to Legal Trailblazer: Agiloft's GC on Redefining In-House Counsel With Innovation and Tech
7 minute readLegal Tech's Predictions for Legal Ops & In-House in 2025
Lawyers Drowning in Cases Are Embracing AI Fastest—and Say It's Yielding Better Outcomes for Clients
Trending Stories
- 1Inside Track: AI Is Sure to Fray Big Law's Devotion to Billable Hour
- 2Evidence Explained: Prevailing Attorney Outlines Successful Defense in Inmate Death Case
- 3The Week in Data Jan. 24: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
- 4The Use of Psychologists as Coaches/Trial Consultants
- 5Could This Be the Era of Client-Centricity?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250