Cheat Sheet: A quick guide to doing business in China
It has the second largest economy in the world, the largest population and the fastest-growing market of any country. Businesses would be foolish to ignore it.
November 01, 2012 at 05:30 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
It has the second largest economy in the world, the largest population and the fastest-growing market of any country. Businesses would be foolish to ignore it. “Any company that wants to be global has to be in China,” says Newegg Inc. Chief Legal Officer Lee Cheng.
But it would also be foolish to head in unprepared. Our November cover story provides in-house counsel with the information they need to succeed in China, updating our 2006 China report with the many changes the country has undergone in the past six years.
This Cheat Sheet will provide you with a quick and dirty version of our cover story, condensing it into a five-minute crash course on doing business in China. For the full version, click here.
Business Basics
While it's easier now to break into China's market than it was 10 years ago, the government still plays a large role in controlling business within the country. Expect to have to seek government approval at just about every turn, and find a local lawyer to help you understand the country's evolving regulations.
But don't forget about U.S. regulations, either. Especially the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Personal relationships are very important in the Chinese business community—“as important as any written document or contract,” says Christian Na, deputy general counsel of Circor International Inc—and such ties can be easily abused or interpreted as bribery. Make sure to keep your relationships on the legitimate side of the law.
Changing Courts
China has a civil law system, meaning it isn't bound by stare decisis, the rule that says lower courts must rely on judicial precedent. However, the country is trying to push for more uniform decision-making among its courts. The Supreme People's Court of China has published several “guiding cases,” meant to show other courts examples of “sound judicial decision-making,” Hogan Lovells Partner Song Zhu says.
While these guiding cases have so far not been relevant to foreign businesses, the next batch is expected to include an intellectual property case. IP is an issue that foreign companies should keep their eye on when operating in China, as you'll see on the next page.
Improving IP
China is trying to move away from its image as a manufacturing mecca, and promote indigenous innovation. It's working, too. The country had the most patent applications in the world in 2011—1.63 million. Unfortunately, this indigenous innovation sometimes amounts to “tweaking” foreign technology, leaving some companies worried about protecting their IP in China.
The good news is that China recently closed a loophole in its law that used to allow applicants to receive Chinese patents on inventions that were already patented elsewhere in the world. Even so, King & Wood Mallesons Partner Alex Zhang recommends being quick to enforce IP rights, and employing a lawyer who can read and write Chinese to check contracts for any IP trickery from businesses whose practices have yet to catch up with the country's laws.
Employment Environment
Experts told us that Chinese worker rights have been steadily improving over the past six years, perhaps thanks to the Labor Contract Law, which went into effect on Jan. 1, 2008. The law requires written contracts and overtime pay, among other provisions that drive up costs for employers, but Ricardo Ernst, a professor of global logistics at Georgetown University says it's not all bad. Having contracts makes company policies more easily enforceable.
“Requiring contracts is a very good idea,” Ernst says. “The transparency of rules is, at the end of the day, what brings success.”
One thing employers don't really have to worry about is unions. Despite media reports after an outbreak of labor strikes in 2010 that said the All-China Federation of Trade Unions was going to start advocating for workers more, Dan Harris, a partner at Harris & Moure and author of the firm's China Law Blog, says that the unions really don't have teeth.
“There's no real union. It's the government that's telling them what to do and when,” Harris says. “This whole thing about [how] they're going to advocate for the workers and all that? Bull.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawyers Drowning in Cases Are Embracing AI Fastest—and Say It's Yielding Better Outcomes for Clients
GC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
8 minute readWhy ACLU's New Legal Director Says It's a 'Good Time to Take the Reins'
Trending Stories
- 1Tuesday Newspaper
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-85
- 3Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 4Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 5Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250