Shareholder sues Hershey over documents revealing alleged African child labor
Just one day after Halloweenone of the biggest days for candy consumptionThe Hershey Co. is facing a lawsuit alleging it could knowingly have violated and benefited from child-trafficking laws.
November 02, 2012 at 06:48 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Just one day after Halloween—one of the biggest days for candy consumption—The Hershey Co. is facing a lawsuit alleging it could knowingly have violated and benefited from child-trafficking laws.
Yesterday, the Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System, a Hershey shareholder, sued the country's leading chocolate maker, demanding it uncover documents that reveal its knowledge of allegedly working with cocoa suppliers in Ghana and the Ivory Coast that use child labor.
“By producing chocolate at its Pennsylvania factory that is the product of child and forced labor in West Africa, Hershey has flouted domestic and foreign law and placed at risk its century old brand and reputation,” said the complaint, which the shareholder filed in the Delaware Chancery Court. If the court orders Hershey to turn over the documents, the shareholder could look for evidence that would support a lawsuit against the company and its directors.
In a statement, Hershey said that it has “been involved in on-the-ground programs, working with public and private partners, to help eliminate inappropriate labor practices in cocoa communities.” The company says it is committed to ensuring that by 2020 all of its cocoa will come from suppliers meeting international labor standards.
Thomson Reuters reports that a 2011 Tulane University study found that 1.8 million children in Ghana and the Ivory Coast work in the cocoa industry, and the majority of them are unpaid.
Such findings have prompted concern over Hershey's and other chocolate companies' business practices. Last month, Whole Foods Market opted to pull Scharffen Berger, Hershey's artisan chocolate brand, from its shelves after pressure from activists.
For more recent Hershey news, read:
For more InsideCounsel stories about child labor, read:
Just one day after Halloween—one of the biggest days for candy consumption—The Hershey Co. is facing a lawsuit alleging it could knowingly have violated and benefited from child-trafficking laws.
Yesterday, the Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System, a Hershey shareholder, sued the country's leading chocolate maker, demanding it uncover documents that reveal its knowledge of allegedly working with cocoa suppliers in Ghana and the Ivory Coast that use child labor.
“By producing chocolate at its Pennsylvania factory that is the product of child and forced labor in West Africa, Hershey has flouted domestic and foreign law and placed at risk its century old brand and reputation,” said the complaint, which the shareholder filed in the Delaware Chancery Court. If the court orders Hershey to turn over the documents, the shareholder could look for evidence that would support a lawsuit against the company and its directors.
In a statement, Hershey said that it has “been involved in on-the-ground programs, working with public and private partners, to help eliminate inappropriate labor practices in cocoa communities.” The company says it is committed to ensuring that by 2020 all of its cocoa will come from suppliers meeting international labor standards.
Thomson Reuters reports that a 2011 Tulane University study found that 1.8 million children in Ghana and the Ivory Coast work in the cocoa industry, and the majority of them are unpaid.
Such findings have prompted concern over Hershey's and other chocolate companies' business practices. Last month,
For more recent Hershey news, read:
For more InsideCounsel stories about child labor, read:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCoinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute readBaker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Trending Stories
- 1Tuesday Newspaper
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-85
- 3Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 4Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 5Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250