CME Group faces criticism over Dodd-Frank lawsuit
CME Group Inc., the worlds largest futures and derivatives market, has come under fire for its recent lawsuit against the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, which it filed in an effort to block the implementation of certain Dodd-Frank reporting requirements.
November 13, 2012 at 06:47 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
CME Group Inc., the world's largest futures and derivatives market, has come under fire for its recent lawsuit against the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, which it filed in an effort to block the implementation of certain Dodd-Frank reporting requirements.
The impending rules would require registered derivatives clearing organizations to report nonpublic information about cleared swap transactions to swap data repositories established under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. In a lawsuit filed Thursday, CME requested a permanent injunction against these rules, arguing that they “would impose costly cumbersome and duplicative requirements” on clearinghouses.
In the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, federal regulators have proposed or implemented rules designed to boost transparency and increase oversight of financial markets. Many financial industry participants have pushed back against these regulations, but at least one of those participants is siding with the government in its fight with CME.
The Depository Trust & Clearing Corp. (DTCC), which has received CFTC approval to run swap data repositories, filed a motion Monday to act as a defendant on the side of the agency. In a letter sent to the CFTC, DTCC said that CME's lawsuit “threatens to dismantle and disrupt the entire regulatory regime statutorily mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act in order to preserve CME's exclusive access to data that it acquires through its role as a derivatives clearing organization.”
CME is trying to establish its own swap data repository, but has not yet received approval from the CFTC. In the interim, the federal rules would require it to report trades to rival repositories, such as those run by DTCC and IntercontinentalExchange Inc.
Read more at Futures Magazine.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of the financial industry, see:
The impending rules would require registered derivatives clearing organizations to report nonpublic information about cleared swap transactions to swap data repositories established under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. In a lawsuit filed Thursday, CME requested a permanent injunction against these rules, arguing that they “would impose costly cumbersome and duplicative requirements” on clearinghouses.
In the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, federal regulators have proposed or implemented rules designed to boost transparency and increase oversight of financial markets. Many financial industry participants have pushed back against these regulations, but at least one of those participants is siding with the government in its fight with CME.
The Depository Trust & Clearing Corp. (DTCC), which has received CFTC approval to run swap data repositories, filed a motion Monday to act as a defendant on the side of the agency. In a letter sent to the CFTC, DTCC said that CME's lawsuit “threatens to dismantle and disrupt the entire regulatory regime statutorily mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act in order to preserve CME's exclusive access to data that it acquires through its role as a derivatives clearing organization.”
CME is trying to establish its own swap data repository, but has not yet received approval from the CFTC. In the interim, the federal rules would require it to report trades to rival repositories, such as those run by DTCC and IntercontinentalExchange Inc.
Read more at Futures Magazine.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of the financial industry, see:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Lawsuit Against Amazon Could Reshape E-Commerce Landscape
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-68
- 2Friday Newspaper
- 3Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 4Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 5NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250