Hobby Lobby must cover morning-after pill, judge rules
Hobby Lobby Stores Inc. has until Jan. 1 to include emergency contraceptives in its health care plan, after a federal judge rejected the companys efforts to block part of President Obamas health care law.
November 20, 2012 at 06:05 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Hobby Lobby Stores Inc. has until Jan. 1 to include emergency contraceptives in its health care plan, after a federal judge rejected the company's efforts to block part of President Obama's health care law.
The Oklahoma-based arts and crafts store filed suit in September, arguing that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) violates its religious beliefs by requiring employers to cover emergency contraception such as the morning-after and week-after pills.
The company's Christian owners say that these pills, which prevent ovulation or fertilization, are a form of abortion, as they can prevent fertilized eggs from attaching to the uterine wall. Failure to comply with the PPACA's mandate could cost the company $1.3 million in fines per day, according to Hobby Lobby's original request for a preliminary injunction.
On Monday, however, Judge Joe Heaton denied the company's request, ruling that, as a secular organization, the company does not qualify for an exemption from the health care law. Although Heaton noted that “the court [was] not unsympathetic” to Hobby Lobby's dilemma, he ultimately ruled that “plaintiffs have not cited, and the court has not found, any case concluding that secular, for-profit corporations such as Hobby Lobby and Mardel have a constitutional right to the free exercise of religion.”
Hobby Lobby's lawyers say the company plans to appeal the verdict, according to the Associated Press.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of the health care law, see:
Hobby Lobby sues not to cover morning-after pill
Obamacare faces another lawsuit over contraception coverage
Employers must choose to pay or play under the Affordable Care Act
Sears, Darden Restaurants announce defined-contribution programs for employee health benefits
The Oklahoma-based arts and crafts store filed suit in September, arguing that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) violates its religious beliefs by requiring employers to cover emergency contraception such as the morning-after and week-after pills.
The company's Christian owners say that these pills, which prevent ovulation or fertilization, are a form of abortion, as they can prevent fertilized eggs from attaching to the uterine wall. Failure to comply with the PPACA's mandate could cost the company $1.3 million in fines per day, according to Hobby Lobby's original request for a preliminary injunction.
On Monday, however, Judge
Hobby Lobby's lawyers say the company plans to appeal the verdict, according to
For more InsideCounsel coverage of the health care law, see:
Hobby Lobby sues not to cover morning-after pill
Obamacare faces another lawsuit over contraception coverage
Employers must choose to pay or play under the Affordable Care Act
Sears,
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllExits Leave American Airlines, SiriusXM, Spotify Searching for New Legal Chiefs
2 minute read'A Warning Shot to Board Rooms': DOJ Decision to Fight $14B Tech Merger May Be Bad Omen for Industry
'Incredibly Complicated'? Antitrust Litigators Identify Pros and Cons of Proposed One Agency Act
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250