Manufacturer of allegedly contaminated steroid tries to distance itself from meningitis outbreak
Lawsuits against the manufacturer that made the allegedly contaminated steroids responsible for a deadly meningitis outbreak across the nation are getting incredibly serious.
November 21, 2012 at 05:52 AM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Lawsuits against the manufacturer that made the allegedly contaminated steroids responsible for a deadly meningitis outbreak across the nation are getting incredibly serious. Victims recently put forward a motion to freeze $500 million of the pharmacy's assets.
But the New England Compounding Center (NECC) is fighting back. On Tuesday, the pharmacy's lawyers told a federal judge that there is no evidence that the NECC's owners directly participated in events leading to the fungal meningitis outbreak that has killed 34 people so far, and affected almost 500. They also sought to block the plaintiffs' motion to freeze assets.
Barry Cadden, the NECC's chief pharmacist, was subpoenaed for a hearing before the House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee earlier this month. But according to his lawyer, he hasn't compounded any drugs for years. His wife, Lisa Cadden is also a part owner and has not worked as a pharmacist for seven years, according to defense lawyers.
Thomas Sobol, the plaintiffs' lawyer, is not buying it. If Lisa Cadden is one of the key people answering questions about NECC's operations, she can't claim to be a soccer mom, he says. Sobol also claims his motion to freeze assets is reasonable, that it wouldn't keep the Caddens from buying Thanksgiving dinner, only from, say, selling their house and putting the money in an account in the Cayman Islands.
Defense lawyer Bruce Singal complained at the hearing that his clients were “under siege” by many government organizations. “Almost anybody you can think of, except for NASA, has showed up so far,” he said.
Read more at Thomson Reuters.
Read more InsideCounsel coverage of disease-based lawsuits:
Plaintiff wins $7.2 million in popcorn lung suit
Chinese drywall maker to face U.S. lawsuits over allegedly faulty product
First lawsuit filed regarding salmonella outbreak
Teva to pay $250 million to end hepatitis C cases
Family sues AA and Sky Chefs, claim in-flight meal lead to relative's death
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology
Coinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute readBaker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Trending Stories
- 1NY AG James Targets Crypto Fraud Which Allegedly Ensnared Victims With Fake Jobs
- 2The 'Motherhood Advantage' in Law: Time to Flip the Script
- 3Fenwick & West Shutters Decade-Old Shanghai Office
- 4Thompson Coe, 2 Lawyers, Hit by $1M+ Legal Mal Suit
- 5Regulatory Intelligence Platform Abstract Announces $4.8 Million in Seed Funding
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250