BP enters plea in Gulf oil spill criminal case
BP Plc pleaded not guilty on Tuesday to 14 criminal counts in connection with the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill, which killed 11 oil rig workers and poured 4.9 million barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico.
November 28, 2012 at 06:29 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
BP Plc pleaded not guilty on Tuesday to 14 criminal counts in connection with the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill, which killed 11 oil rig workers and poured 4.9 million barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico.
The plea is a procedural move, as the company has already agreed to plead guilty to the charges and pay a record-setting $4.5 billion penalty to settle claims brought by the Department of Justice and Securities and Exchange Commission.
“Today's agreement is consistent with BP's position in the ongoing civil litigation that this was an accident resulting from multiple causes, involving multiple parties, as found by other official investigations,” BP said in a statement when the settlement was announced on Nov. 15.
In March, the oil company announced that it would pay $7.8 billion to settle a class action lawsuit involving more than 100,000 plaintiffs who suffered medical or economic damages in the wake of the spill. That settlement is currently pending approval.
But the company is still facing additional civil claims from the government, which could bring more hefty fines. In addition, two BP oil rig supervisors and a former company executive are scheduled to be arraigned Wednesday on criminal charges related to the rig explosion and its aftermath.
In more bad news for the company, the Environmental Protection Agency announced Wednesday that it has temporarily suspended BP from any new contracts with the U.S. government because of the company's “lack of business integrity as demonstrated by [its] conduct with regard to the Deepwater Horizon blowout, explosion, oil spill and response.”
Read more at Futures Magazine.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of the oil industry, see:
BP will pay $4.5 billion in Deepwater Horizon oil spill settlement
BP, plaintiffs ask judge to approve $7.8 billion oil spill settlement
Regulatory: The challenges of newfound energy wealth
Nigerians bring pollution case against Shell in the Netherlands
Exxon Mobil faces lawsuits over Yellowstone River oil spill
Chevron fraud case heads to U.S. as Ecuadorean judge orders seizure of the company's assets
BP Plc pleaded not guilty on Tuesday to 14 criminal counts in connection with the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill, which killed 11 oil rig workers and poured 4.9 million barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico.
The plea is a procedural move, as the company has already agreed to plead guilty to the charges and pay a record-setting $4.5 billion penalty to settle claims brought by the Department of Justice and Securities and Exchange Commission.
“Today's agreement is consistent with BP's position in the ongoing civil litigation that this was an accident resulting from multiple causes, involving multiple parties, as found by other official investigations,” BP said in a statement when the settlement was announced on Nov. 15.
In March, the oil company announced that it would pay $7.8 billion to settle a class action lawsuit involving more than 100,000 plaintiffs who suffered medical or economic damages in the wake of the spill. That settlement is currently pending approval.
But the company is still facing additional civil claims from the government, which could bring more hefty fines. In addition, two BP oil rig supervisors and a former company executive are scheduled to be arraigned Wednesday on criminal charges related to the rig explosion and its aftermath.
In more bad news for the company, the Environmental Protection Agency announced Wednesday that it has temporarily suspended BP from any new contracts with the U.S. government because of the company's “lack of business integrity as demonstrated by [its] conduct with regard to the Deepwater Horizon blowout, explosion, oil spill and response.”
Read more at Futures Magazine.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of the oil industry, see:
BP will pay $4.5 billion in Deepwater Horizon oil spill settlement
BP, plaintiffs ask judge to approve $7.8 billion oil spill settlement
Regulatory: The challenges of newfound energy wealth
Nigerians bring pollution case against Shell in the
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Meta Hires Litigation Strategy Chief, Tapping King & Spalding Partner Who Was Senior DOJ Official in First Trump Term
Apple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology
Coinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
