Hearst lawyers email former unpaid interns seeking stories of “valued opportunities”
To counteract the angry unpaid interns whove had bad experiences (and are going to court because of it), the magazine giant Hearst Corp. is seeking the stories of interns who valued the opportunities and experiences they received from their internships.
December 06, 2012 at 06:18 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
To counteract the angry unpaid interns who've had bad experiences (and are going to court because of it), the magazine giant Hearst Corp. is seeking the stories of interns “who valued the opportunities and experiences they received from their internships.”
That quote comes from an email that Hearst's legal counsel sent to former interns of its fashion magazine, Harper's Bazaar, which someone then forwarded to New York magazine. The woman who began the class-action suit against Hearst, Xuedan Wang, was also an intern at Harper's Bazaar.
The Hearst suit is just one of many brought by unpaid interns against their former employers. Interns who worked on the movie “Black Swan” filed a lawsuit in 2011, and talk show host Charlie Rose was hit with litigation in March.
Unpaid internships are technically legal, as long as the employer follows guidelines set by the Department of Labor, which provide that the internship must be an educational experience for the intern, and not provide any benefit to the company. These suits allege that the defendant employers did not follow these guidelines.
Hearst's attempt to find satisfied former interns may be a successful strategy. There are two sides to the unpaid intern debate. On one hand, an internship (especially in the competitive magazine industry) can provide a jump start to someone's career. On the other hand, the system perpetuates a cycle where low-income Americans have difficulty finding jobs in such industries because they can't afford to work for free and get the same experience that those who can afford the internships do.
Read more about unpaid interns on InsideCounsel:
“Black Swan” intern suit may get bigger
Labor: When unpaid interns become unpaid employees
Labor: The perils of using unpaid interns
Slate looks at the social problems surrounding unpaid internships
To counteract the angry unpaid interns who've had bad experiences (and are going to court because of it), the magazine giant Hearst Corp. is seeking the stories of interns “who valued the opportunities and experiences they received from their internships.”
That quote comes from an email that Hearst's legal counsel sent to former interns of its fashion magazine, Harper's Bazaar, which someone then forwarded to
The Hearst suit is just one of many brought by unpaid interns against their former employers. Interns who worked on the movie “Black Swan” filed a lawsuit in 2011, and talk show host Charlie Rose was hit with litigation in March.
Unpaid internships are technically legal, as long as the employer follows guidelines set by the Department of Labor, which provide that the internship must be an educational experience for the intern, and not provide any benefit to the company. These suits allege that the defendant employers did not follow these guidelines.
Hearst's attempt to find satisfied former interns may be a successful strategy. There are two sides to the unpaid intern debate. On one hand, an internship (especially in the competitive magazine industry) can provide a jump start to someone's career. On the other hand, the system perpetuates a cycle where low-income Americans have difficulty finding jobs in such industries because they can't afford to work for free and get the same experience that those who can afford the internships do.
Read more about unpaid interns on InsideCounsel:
“Black Swan” intern suit may get bigger
Labor: When unpaid interns become unpaid employees
Labor: The perils of using unpaid interns
Slate looks at the social problems surrounding unpaid internships
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology
Coinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute readBaker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Trending Stories
- 1Legal Tech's Predictions for Legal Ops & In-House in 2025
- 2SDNY US Attorney Damian Williams Lands at Paul Weiss
- 3Litigators of the Week: A Knockout Blow to Latest FCC Net Neutrality Rules After ‘Loper Bright’
- 4Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 5Norton Rose Sues South Africa Government Over Ethnicity Score System
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250