Unpaid bloggers who wrote for the Huffington Post are not entitled to profits from the site's sale to AOL Inc., the 2nd Circuit ruled Wednesday.

The bloggers, who had sought class-action status for 9,000 unpaid contributors to the news website, said that they agreed to provide their content for free as a public service, and that they would not have done so “had they known that [the site] would be use their efforts…to make itself desirable as a merger target for a large media corporation.”

When AOL bought the Huffington Post for $315 million last year, the writers claimed that they deserved a cut—$105 million, to be precise—since their content added significant value to the website. They also argued that HuffPo hid numbers about its revenue and traffic numbers from the contributors.

But a three-judge panel of the 2nd Circuit upheld a lower court's decision against the bloggers, ruling that the writers knew that “they would receive compensation only in form of exposure in promotion.”

Read more at Thomson Reuters.

For more InsideCounsel coverage of unpaid employees, see:

Unpaid bloggers who wrote for the Huffington Post are not entitled to profits from the site's sale to AOL Inc., the 2nd Circuit ruled Wednesday.

The bloggers, who had sought class-action status for 9,000 unpaid contributors to the news website, said that they agreed to provide their content for free as a public service, and that they would not have done so “had they known that [the site] would be use their efforts…to make itself desirable as a merger target for a large media corporation.”

When AOL bought the Huffington Post for $315 million last year, the writers claimed that they deserved a cut—$105 million, to be precise—since their content added significant value to the website. They also argued that HuffPo hid numbers about its revenue and traffic numbers from the contributors.

But a three-judge panel of the 2nd Circuit upheld a lower court's decision against the bloggers, ruling that the writers knew that “they would receive compensation only in form of exposure in promotion.”

Read more at Thomson Reuters.

For more InsideCounsel coverage of unpaid employees, see: