Pillsbury, Dickstein Shapiro in merger discussions
Another law firm marriage could be on the horizon.
December 18, 2012 at 05:22 AM
27 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Another law firm marriage could be on the horizon.
Yesterday, anonymous sources told Thomson Reuters that leaders from New York-based Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman and Washington-based Dickstein Shapiro have been in “serious and ongoing” merger discussions for the past month.
Some sources familiar with the discussions say the merger isn't anywhere near complete, but one source speculated that the discussions may have ceased because of concerns about the financial structure of the deal.
In a statement, a Dickstein spokeswoman said the firm was remaining strategic in its growth plan and that it had a “rock-solid, debt-free financial platform.” Although the spokeswoman said the firm was “very optimistic” about its future, she would not comment on the possible Pillsbury merger discussions. A Dickstein partner also confirmed yesterday that the firm has been in merger talks with multiple law firms, though he didn't confirm that Pillsbury was one of them.
Meanwhile, a Pillsbury spokesperson declined to comment.
A marriage between the two firms would strengthen Pillsbury's government contracts, intellectual property and insurance practices. The merger also would augment Dickstein's energy and corporate practices.
Pillsbury has 615 lawyers, and Dickstein has 340 lawyers, but it's unclear whether the marriage would result in layoffs, promotions or demotions, according to Thomson Reuters.
Dickstein is the latest law firm Pillsbury has courted over the past couple years. Last year, the firm was in talks with Fulbright & Jaworski before the latter announced that it would merge with Norton Rose last month. Before that, Pillsbury considered merging with Nixon Peabody and Chadbourne & Parke.
Read more recent law firm news:
Another law firm marriage could be on the horizon.
Yesterday, anonymous sources told Thomson Reuters that leaders from New York-based
Some sources familiar with the discussions say the merger isn't anywhere near complete, but one source speculated that the discussions may have ceased because of concerns about the financial structure of the deal.
In a statement, a Dickstein spokeswoman said the firm was remaining strategic in its growth plan and that it had a “rock-solid, debt-free financial platform.” Although the spokeswoman said the firm was “very optimistic” about its future, she would not comment on the possible Pillsbury merger discussions. A Dickstein partner also confirmed yesterday that the firm has been in merger talks with multiple law firms, though he didn't confirm that Pillsbury was one of them.
Meanwhile, a Pillsbury spokesperson declined to comment.
A marriage between the two firms would strengthen Pillsbury's government contracts, intellectual property and insurance practices. The merger also would augment Dickstein's energy and corporate practices.
Pillsbury has 615 lawyers, and Dickstein has 340 lawyers, but it's unclear whether the marriage would result in layoffs, promotions or demotions, according to Thomson Reuters.
Dickstein is the latest law firm Pillsbury has courted over the past couple years. Last year, the firm was in talks with
Read more recent law firm news:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRepublican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
4 minute readSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
FTC Lauds Withdrawal of Proposed Indiana Hospitals Merger After Leaning on State Regulators
4 minute readHow Qualcomm’s General Counsel Is Championing Diversity in Innovation
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250