To influence government policy, you have to know your endgame
Making good policy is more like running a marathon than a sprint.
January 04, 2013 at 04:15 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Making good policy is more like running a marathon than a sprint. It simply takes time and effort to figure out where you are now and how to get where you want to be in the future. In my particular case, what started as a list of priorities hand-written on a yellow legal pad in December 2001, when I was the first and only lawyer at Go Daddy, evolved into a sophisticated set of policies, processes, standard operating procedures, industry best practices, proposed legislation and fully enacted laws, implemented by a staff of nearly 100 dedicated employees who, over more than a decade, came to make up the Go Daddy legal department. Looking back on that evolution, I couldn't be prouder of what we accomplished, and the wheels of progress we set in motion that will keep rolling for many years to come.
Many freshly minted in-house lawyers have reached out to me over the last number of years to ask about that policy development evolution, and the process I developed to get from a yellow legal pad to fully enacted laws. I take great joy in sharing the story with them, some of which I have told in this series in articles about knowing your big picture, strategy, goals, audience and players in order to effectively influence policy. As I said, I am extremely proud of the decade I spent at Go Daddy and the lasting impact that time will have on the Internet. Still, every good story has to have an ending, and for this series, the final lesson is this: know your endgame.
But, before we get there, let's quickly review. In order to help shape policy, as inside counsel, you have to know at least the following:
- The big picture. What is the lay of the land where you operate?
- Your strategy. Is internal or external policy development the best approach for your client?
- Your goals. Should you focus on making good policy, avoiding bad policy, or both?
- Your audience. Are you seeking to shape policy at a local, state, national or international level?
- The players. Who are your allies and enemies?
It took me some time to figure out the answers to those five questions, as it will for anyone who is hoping to have a significant impact on policy, at any level, especially in a newly established policy shop. Remember, it's like running a marathon. Good things take time and effort. But even after the answers to those important questions have been firmly established, you still have to answer the most fundamental question of all: what is your endgame?
Here is where I make the most important point in this entire six-part series:
If you don't know your endgame, the rest of the policy development process is meaningless.
An endgame is purpose. It's why you are doing what you're doing. It's why you care about being involved in shaping policy. It's how you go from making a living to making a difference. And, it's a powerful thing to know, in business and in life.
For me, the endgame was always to make the Internet a better and safer place, especially for children. It was hard work punctuated by long hours, sleepless nights, missed vacations, endless travel, intellectual gymnastics, political jockeying, disappointments, failures and rejections. But there is no greater joy than knowing you helped save the life of even one child who was being brutally abused. And, that endgame, my friends, is something I hope you will each have the joy of experiencing at least once in your career as inside counsel.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCrypto Industry Eyes Legislation to Clarify Regulatory Framework
SEC Official Hints at More Restraint With Industry Bars, Less With Wells Meetings
4 minute readTrump Fires EEOC Commissioners, Kneecapping Democrat-Controlled Civil Rights Agency
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250