Lance Armstrong doping scandal sparks litigation
On Thursday, cyclist Lance Armstrong finally admitted to using performance-enhancing drugs, confirming allegations that have been swirling for years.
January 18, 2013 at 06:36 AM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
On Thursday, cyclist Lance Armstrong finally admitted to using performance-enhancing drugs, confirming allegations that have been swirling for years.
The confession has certainly had professional ramifications for the cyclist, who resigned from the board of his Livestrong cancer charity, lost sponsorship deals and was stripped of his Tour de France victories and his 2000 Olympic bronze medal in the wake of the scandal. But legal ramifications are coming as well, as companies, individuals and even the U.S. government are said to be mulling lawsuits against Armstrong.
One such company, SCA Promotions, has threatened to take legal action if Armstrong does not return $12 million in bonus money that it gave him following his Tour de France victories. Tailwind Sports, which owned Armstrong's U.S. Postal team, pledged a $5 million bonus to Armstrong if he won his sixth title. The company took out insurance with SCA Promotions to cover the cost, but SCA refused to pay up when Armstrong won, citing doping allegations against the cyclist. Armstrong eventually won a 2006 settlement with the insurance company that included the bonus, interest and attorney fees.
The disgraced athlete could also be in trouble with the U.S. Department of Justice, which is considering joining a whistleblower suit against Armstrong, the Wall Street Journal reported. Armstrong's former teammate, Floyd Landis, filed the suit in 2010, claiming that Armstrong defrauded the U.S. government by taking $30.6 million in sponsorship money from the U.S. Postal Service between 2001 and 2004. The team's contract with the Postal Service reportedly said that the agreement would be rendered invalid if any riders or team personnel attracted negative publicity due to banned substances.
And Armstrong is already facing a $1.5 million lawsuit courtesy of a British newspaper that paid him nearly half-a-million dollars to settle a libel suit in 2006. The cyclist sued the Sunday Times after the Rupert Murdoch-owned paper reprinted allegations that he had taken performance-enhancing drugs.
Read more at Thomson Reuters.
For more sports-related scandals on InsideCounsel, see:
On Thursday, cyclist Lance Armstrong finally admitted to using performance-enhancing drugs, confirming allegations that have been swirling for years.
The confession has certainly had professional ramifications for the cyclist, who resigned from the board of his Livestrong cancer charity, lost sponsorship deals and was stripped of his Tour de France victories and his 2000 Olympic bronze medal in the wake of the scandal. But legal ramifications are coming as well, as companies, individuals and even the U.S. government are said to be mulling lawsuits against Armstrong.
One such company, SCA Promotions, has threatened to take legal action if Armstrong does not return $12 million in bonus money that it gave him following his Tour de France victories. Tailwind Sports, which owned Armstrong's U.S. Postal team, pledged a $5 million bonus to Armstrong if he won his sixth title. The company took out insurance with SCA Promotions to cover the cost, but SCA refused to pay up when Armstrong won, citing doping allegations against the cyclist. Armstrong eventually won a 2006 settlement with the insurance company that included the bonus, interest and attorney fees.
The disgraced athlete could also be in trouble with the U.S. Department of Justice, which is considering joining a whistleblower suit against Armstrong, the Wall Street Journal reported. Armstrong's former teammate, Floyd Landis, filed the suit in 2010, claiming that Armstrong defrauded the U.S. government by taking $30.6 million in sponsorship money from the U.S. Postal Service between 2001 and 2004. The team's contract with the Postal Service reportedly said that the agreement would be rendered invalid if any riders or team personnel attracted negative publicity due to banned substances.
And Armstrong is already facing a $1.5 million lawsuit courtesy of a British newspaper that paid him nearly half-a-million dollars to settle a libel suit in 2006. The cyclist sued the Sunday Times after the Rupert Murdoch-owned paper reprinted allegations that he had taken performance-enhancing drugs.
Read more at Thomson Reuters.
For more sports-related scandals on InsideCounsel, see:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Lawsuit Against Amazon Could Reshape E-Commerce Landscape
Trending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250