Supreme Court will hear law firms’ appeals in Allen Stanford case
Two law firms are heading to battle as defendants in the high court.
January 21, 2013 at 05:28 AM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Two law firms are heading to battle as defendants in the high court.
On Friday, the Supreme Court accepted appeals from Chadbourne & Parke and Proskauer Rose, two law firms that once represented R. Allen Stanford, a convicted Ponzi schemer who a judge last year sentenced to 110 years behind bars. Stanford swindled investors out of more than $7 billion over 20 years. Chadbourne and Proskauer are seeking to avoid state-law suits that Stanford's investors, seeking to recoup their losses, brought against them.
The lawsuits seek to hold the two law firms responsible for the actions of Thomas Sjoblom, a lawyer who worked at both firms and who the investors claim obstructed a Securities and Exchange Commission probe into Stanford.
The firms, however, claim that the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act (SLUSA)—which prevents plaintiffs from filing state-law class actions alleging fraud in connection with the purchase or sale of nationally traded securities—preclude the plaintiffs' suits.
A district court judge ruled in October 2011 that SLUSA preempted the plaintiffs' suits. But in March 2012, the 5th Circuit reversed the decision, finding that the fraud was only tangentially related to the investors' securities purchases.
After the 5th Circuit's decision, which created a significant split among the circuits, experts predicted the case would head to the Supreme Court. “The Supreme Court in the past few terms has been much more active in getting involved in securities cases and class actions,” Neal Marder, a partner at Winston & Strawn, told InsideCounsel in June 2012. “This may very well provide the opportunity for the Supreme Court to intervene and decide in a more uniform way what 'in connection with' is intended to mean under SLUSA.”
The Supreme Court could hear the appeal in April and will likely deliver a decision by the end of June.
Read Thomson Reuters for more information.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of the Stanford case, read:
R. Allen Stanford sentenced to 110 years in prison
Federal securities law doesn't preclude state law class actions
Investors file suit against Proskauer Rose and Chadbourne & Parke
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
