Junior Seau’s family sues NFL over brain damage
Just weeks shy of the Super Bowl, the National Football League (NFL) is making headlines as the subject of yet another lawsuit related to the suicide of a player.
January 24, 2013 at 07:04 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Just weeks shy of the Super Bowl, the National Football League (NFL) is making headlines as the subject of yet another lawsuit related to the suicide of a player.
The family of former San Diego Chargers linebacker Junior Seau filed the latest suit, claiming that the brain damage Seau suffered during his 20-year career led to his suicide. Seau shot himself in the chest last May, and a subsequent study by the National Institutes of Health found that the 43-year-old suffered from chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), a degenerative neurological disease linked to head injuries.
Seau's family claims that the NFL knowingly concealed the risks associated with repeated blows to the head, saying in a statement that the league “propogated the false myth that collisions of all kinds…many of which lead to short-term and long-term neurological damage to players, are an acceptable, desired and natural consequence of the game.” Their lawsuit claims fraud, wrongful death and negligence, and seeks unspecified damages from the NFL and several football helmet makers.
This certainly isn't the first time the league has faced criticism—and legal action—over head injuries. Last June, more than 2,000 players filed a unified complaint that accuses the NFL of failing to inform them about the health risks of playing football.
Seau's death followed several other high-profile suicides by former players, including former NFL safeties Dave Duerson and Ray Easterling. Autopsies on both men revealed evidence of brain damage.
Until recently, CTE could only be observed during autopsies. But earlier this week, researchers at UCLA published a study in which they claim to have spotted CTE in living players for the first time, using a special brain-imaging tool that showed a buildup of abnormal proteins in the brains of five retired NFL players.
Read more at Thomson Reuters.
For more sports-related lawsuits, see:
Just weeks shy of the Super Bowl, the National Football League (NFL) is making headlines as the subject of yet another lawsuit related to the suicide of a player.
The family of former San Diego Chargers linebacker Junior Seau filed the latest suit, claiming that the brain damage Seau suffered during his 20-year career led to his suicide. Seau shot himself in the chest last May, and a subsequent study by the National Institutes of Health found that the 43-year-old suffered from chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), a degenerative neurological disease linked to head injuries.
Seau's family claims that the NFL knowingly concealed the risks associated with repeated blows to the head, saying in a statement that the league “propogated the false myth that collisions of all kinds…many of which lead to short-term and long-term neurological damage to players, are an acceptable, desired and natural consequence of the game.” Their lawsuit claims fraud, wrongful death and negligence, and seeks unspecified damages from the NFL and several football helmet makers.
This certainly isn't the first time the league has faced criticism—and legal action—over head injuries. Last June, more than 2,000 players filed a unified complaint that accuses the NFL of failing to inform them about the health risks of playing football.
Seau's death followed several other high-profile suicides by former players, including former NFL safeties Dave Duerson and Ray Easterling. Autopsies on both men revealed evidence of brain damage.
Until recently, CTE could only be observed during autopsies. But earlier this week, researchers at UCLA published a study in which they claim to have spotted CTE in living players for the first time, using a special brain-imaging tool that showed a buildup of abnormal proteins in the brains of five retired NFL players.
Read more at Thomson Reuters.
For more sports-related lawsuits, see:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Lawsuit Against Amazon Could Reshape E-Commerce Landscape
Trending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250