Rajat Gupta seeks to overturn his insider trading conviction
Rajat Gupta may be behind bars, but his legal saga is far from over.
January 24, 2013 at 06:24 AM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Rajat Gupta may be behind bars, but his legal saga is far from over. He is now seeking to overturn his June 2012 insider trading conviction on the basis that the admission of certain wiretapped conversations prejudiced his defense.
Gupta's lawyers are appealing to the 2nd Circuit, claiming the former Goldman Sachs Group Inc. director was not party to these wiretaps of former hedge fund manager Raj Rajaratnam, with whom Gupta allegedly shared corporate secrets. Gupta's lawyers claim that the wiretaps' admittance, plus the court's decision to limit testimony about Gupta's state of mind, “decisively tipped the scales against him.”
Gupta claims that at the time of the alleged tip, he and Rajaratnam had a falling out over a $10 million investment, leaving Gupta with no incentive to help Rajaratnam.
Read more at the Wall Street Journal.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of Gupta's case, see:
Gupta didn't profit from Rajaratnam tips, lawyer says
Rajat Gupta sentenced to 2 years for insider trading
Bill Gates, Kofi Annan, others ask judge to be fair in Gupta sentencing
Gupta lawyer says another Goldman employee leaked Apple, Intel secrets
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
What to Know About the New 'Overlapping Directorship' Antitrust Development
4 minute read
The Met Hires GC of Elite University as Next Legal Chief
Tesla, Musk Appeal Chancery Compensation Case to Delaware Supreme Court
2 minute read
Turning Over Legal Tedium to AI Requires Lots of Unglamorous Work on Front End
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Legal Tech's Predictions for Legal Ops & In-House in 2025
- 2SDNY US Attorney Damian Williams Lands at Paul Weiss
- 3Litigators of the Week: A Knockout Blow to Latest FCC Net Neutrality Rules After ‘Loper Bright’
- 4Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 5Norton Rose Sues South Africa Government Over Ethnicity Score System
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
