Johnson & Johnson concealed hip implant defects, lawyers say
Johnson & Johnson (J&J) knew of defects in its all-metal hip implants but concealed the information from the public for years, lawyers claimed Friday during opening arguments in one of many personal injury suits involving J&Js articular surface replacement (ASR) implants.
January 28, 2013 at 07:04 AM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Johnson & Johnson (J&J) knew of defects in its all-metal hip implants but concealed the information from the public for years, lawyers claimed Friday during opening arguments in one of many personal injury suits involving J&J's articular surface replacement (ASR) implants.
The company's DePuy unit began selling the implants in 2004, then recalled them in 2010, when data showed that they were failing at relatively high rates. But according to testimony from a company engineer, DePuy officials knew that the ASR's design was flawed and potentially unstable, but kept that information from doctors.
Since the recall, more than 10,000 lawsuits have been filed against the company, but Friday's case is the first to go to trial. The plaintiff, Loren Kransky, is suing the company for failure to warn, defective design and negligent recall, alleging that a design defect in his ASR hip allowed toxic levels of cobalt and chromium to leech into his bloodstream.
J&J, meanwhile, maintains that the supposedly high metal levels in Kransky's body are the result of his numerous other health problems. The 66-year-old is a smoker; suffers from diabetes, high blood pressure and kidney cancer, among other ailments; and was exposed to the Agent Orange chemical while serving in Vietnam, J&J claims.
Read more at Thomson Reuters and Bloomberg.
For more health-related lawsuits on InsideCounsel, see:
Pharmacy linked to meningitis outbreak paid owners $16 million in 2012
Court tosses hospital's challenge to NLRB Health Care Rule
Hobby Lobby loses appeal of contraception coverage
New HIPAA rule expands patient privacy regulations
Supreme Court will rule on gene patentability
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
5 minute read
In-House Lawyers Are Focused on Employment and Cybersecurity Disputes, But Looking Out for Conflict Over AI
Trending Stories
- 1Day Pitney Announces Partner Elevations
- 2The New Rules of AI: Part 2—Designing and Implementing Governance Programs
- 3Plaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
- 4As Litigation Finance Industry Matures, Links With Insurance Tighten
- 5The Gold Standard: Remembering Judge Jeffrey Alker Meyer
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
