The art of GC peer networking
There are dozens of events throughout the year around the country offering inside counsel opportunities for continuing legal education (CLE), broad based networking and dialogue with service provider sponsors.
February 04, 2013 at 06:13 AM
7 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
There are dozens of events throughout the year around the country offering inside counsel opportunities for continuing legal education (CLE), broad based networking and dialogue with service provider sponsors. All of these conferences, seminars and luncheons have merit, but at the general counsel level they can be frustrating. General counsel at non-exclusive events are kind of like rock stars. Except, instead of seeking autographs, attendees who meet a general counsel are often seeking job interviews or sales-related introductions.
Many general counsel crave peer-level networking. They want private opinions on how to handle sensitive situations, and they do seek recommendations on best practices and outside services. Mainly, though, I think general counsel simply enjoy each other's company, as only their peers can truly empathize with the pressures and responsibilities of the role. No doubt each general counsel has his or her small group of peer-level friends for informal conversation. But to meet and get to know a broader base of peers, well, that's where a connector comes in handy.
I wish to thank Jon Resnick and Carol Sabransky at Huron Legal (a division of Huron Consulting Group), for an inside look at the art of creating a successful private event that connects general counsel.
To even attempt an invitation only, GC-only event requires a huge amount of credibility as the starting point. To that end, Carol Sabransky has helped general counsel through challenging issues for years, and the firm's leader, Shahzad Bashir, serves on the national board of directors of The General Counsel Forum. A Connector must have already gained sufficient imprimatur so that his or her email will be read, or a call will be taken. Carol, Shahzad and Jon are quintessential Connectors, the kind of influential experts who Malcolm Gladwell had in mind when he coined that term in his groundbreaking book, “The Tipping Point.”
But access is not enough. A Connector must rally around a topic or create a purpose that is meaningful and merits the time of a general counsel. For this particular event, Carol chose to celebrate the appointments of two first-time general counsel and the high profile move of another to a Fortune 100 company. No agendas, hidden or otherwise. It was an opportunity to welcome new peers to an exclusive community and go about the “business” of talking with each other, unfettered by too many non-peers.
Finally, a great Connector gets out of the way at his or her own event and plays the gracious host. I don't recall anyone promoting Huron Legal services at this celebration. The hosts understood that less is more in such a context and, although I felt like
the proverbial kid in a candy store with about two dozen general counsel in the same room, I get it and behaved accordingly. By the way, I'm choosing not to name drop guests here, and not because Huron Legal asked me to refrain (they had no editorial input into this column). It's because, candidly, I aspire to the role of a high-level Connector myself. I respect the nature of invitation-only events and want general counsel to know that I don't write about private conversations. I am not a reporter. I am a consultant, and InsideCounsel always provides the bio information on its columnists so that our perspectives are clear.
The Connector serves a valuable purpose. I'm familiar with several small and informal collections of general counsel who meet on occasion, often over lunch. But those conversations are limited to a small number of people who already know each other. When a Connector creates an event that rallies a critical mass of “yes” RSVP replies, the result is a dynamic and energized room of general counsel who seem really happy to make new friends and help new peers. That is the art of networking in its highest form.
There are dozens of events throughout the year around the country offering inside counsel opportunities for continuing legal education (CLE), broad based networking and dialogue with service provider sponsors. All of these conferences, seminars and luncheons have merit, but at the general counsel level they can be frustrating. General counsel at non-exclusive events are kind of like rock stars. Except, instead of seeking autographs, attendees who meet a general counsel are often seeking job interviews or sales-related introductions.
Many general counsel crave peer-level networking. They want private opinions on how to handle sensitive situations, and they do seek recommendations on best practices and outside services. Mainly, though, I think general counsel simply enjoy each other's company, as only their peers can truly empathize with the pressures and responsibilities of the role. No doubt each general counsel has his or her small group of peer-level friends for informal conversation. But to meet and get to know a broader base of peers, well, that's where a connector comes in handy.
I wish to thank Jon Resnick and Carol Sabransky at Huron Legal (a division of
To even attempt an invitation only, GC-only event requires a huge amount of credibility as the starting point. To that end, Carol Sabransky has helped general counsel through challenging issues for years, and the firm's leader, Shahzad Bashir, serves on the national board of directors of The General Counsel Forum. A Connector must have already gained sufficient imprimatur so that his or her email will be read, or a call will be taken. Carol, Shahzad and Jon are quintessential Connectors, the kind of influential experts who Malcolm Gladwell had in mind when he coined that term in his groundbreaking book, “The Tipping Point.”
But access is not enough. A Connector must rally around a topic or create a purpose that is meaningful and merits the time of a general counsel. For this particular event, Carol chose to celebrate the appointments of two first-time general counsel and the high profile move of another to a Fortune 100 company. No agendas, hidden or otherwise. It was an opportunity to welcome new peers to an exclusive community and go about the “business” of talking with each other, unfettered by too many non-peers.
Finally, a great Connector gets out of the way at his or her own event and plays the gracious host. I don't recall anyone promoting Huron Legal services at this celebration. The hosts understood that less is more in such a context and, although I felt like
the proverbial kid in a candy store with about two dozen general counsel in the same room, I get it and behaved accordingly. By the way, I'm choosing not to name drop guests here, and not because Huron Legal asked me to refrain (they had no editorial input into this column). It's because, candidly, I aspire to the role of a high-level Connector myself. I respect the nature of invitation-only events and want general counsel to know that I don't write about private conversations. I am not a reporter. I am a consultant, and InsideCounsel always provides the bio information on its columnists so that our perspectives are clear.
The Connector serves a valuable purpose. I'm familiar with several small and informal collections of general counsel who meet on occasion, often over lunch. But those conversations are limited to a small number of people who already know each other. When a Connector creates an event that rallies a critical mass of “yes” RSVP replies, the result is a dynamic and energized room of general counsel who seem really happy to make new friends and help new peers. That is the art of networking in its highest form.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBallooning Workloads, Dearth of Advancement Opportunities Prime In-House Attorneys to Pull Exit Hatch
The Reason a GC Abruptly Departs May Not Be What You Think
Trending Stories
- 1Can The Threat of a Bar Complaint Be a Settlement Tool?
- 2Sentencing Commission Addresses Inconsistent Definitions of “Loss”
- 3What Are Forbidden Sexual Relations With Clients?
- 4AEDI Takeaways: Demystifying Hype, Changing Caselaw & Harvey’s CEO Talks State of Industry
- 5New England Law | Boston Announces New Dean
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250