5 notable GCs in the news
General counsel sound off on gun control, rope swings, traffic tickets and more
February 08, 2013 at 07:51 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Dangerous Driving
“Neither snow, nor rain, nor heat, nor gloom of night, nor traffic lights stays these couriers from the swift completion of their appointed routes.”
–George Hittner, general counsel of American Traffic Solutions (ATS)
It's no secret that the U.S. Postal Service is strapped for cash, so when faced with $700 in traffic tickets, the agency got creative in its efforts to have them dismissed. The agency argued that it should not have to pay the tickets—which it reportedly received when East Cleveland, Ohio, traffic cameras caught postal workers running red lights in school zones—because “the Postal Service enjoys federal immunity from state and local regulation.”
But Hittner, who took it upon himself to rewrite the Postal Service's famed creed, said that the agency should be holding employees responsible for dangerous driving, not “attempting to hide behind an immunity claim.”
Suspended Swinging
“If people want to huck themselves off a cliff or arch that's their business.”
–John Andrews, general counsel of Utah's School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration (SITLA)
Corona Arch—a natural sandstone arch located on state land near Moab, Utah—has achieved fame as both a picturesque rock formation and “the world's largest rope swing.” It earned the latter title last year, when outfitting company Utah High Adventure set up a 250-pendulum rope swing on the arch, and charged clients more than $200 to jump from it.
The state of Utah suspended such commercial jumps earlier this week, citing a fear of lawsuits if it issued permits for paid jumps that subsequently went awry. But don't worry adrenaline junkies: Andrews made it clear the arch will still be open to private citizens looking for a free thrill, explaining that owners who keep their land open for recreational use are generally shielded from liability.
Limiting Lawsuits
“Blaming manufacturers for criminal misuse of firearms is like blaming Ford for drunk-driving crashes.”
–Lawrence Keane, general counsel of the National Shooting Sports Foundation, a firearms industry trade organization based in Newtown, Conn.
Lawmakers in Colorado have introduced a proposal that would hold manufacturers and dealers of assault-style weapons legally liable for crimes committed with their firearms. Even if the proposed law passes, it will be void under the 2005 Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, which shields gun makers from such suits. But the Democrats who came up with the bill say that they are trying to raise public awareness of the federal law, in hopes that the government may repeal it.
Detractors of the federal law say that it allows firearms manufacturers to avoid implementing safety improvements, since they cannot be sued for failing to do so. But Keane and other gun rights advocates say that the measure protects gun makers from lawsuits over crimes that they did not commit.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Lawsuit Against Amazon Could Reshape E-Commerce Landscape
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250