Dewey retirees agree to clawback settlement
A group of Dewey & LeBoeuf retired partners that had been fighting for millions of dollars in compensation from the bankrupt firm changed course Friday and agreed to return a portion of their compensation as part of a clawback settlement.
February 11, 2013 at 06:48 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
A group of Dewey & LeBoeuf retired partners that had been fighting for millions of dollars in compensation from the bankrupt firm changed course Friday and agreed to return a portion of their compensation as part of a clawback settlement.
As part of the proposed deal, up to 125 retirees or their beneficiaries will return either $5,000 or one-quarter of the retirement payments and compensation that Dewey paid them in 2011 and 2012—whichever is smaller. They also will pay back 60 percent of any tax advances that Dewey made on their behalf during the same time period. In return, they will be immune from any future lawsuits connected with the firm's demise.
The ex-partners had previously sued Dewey for more than $80 million, arguing that the firm owed them pension benefits. They also rejected a previous clawback settlement, which more than 400 former partners signed on to last October, because it allegedly favored high-earning partners and shielded firm executives from liability in connection with Dewey's May 2012 bankruptcy.
The retirees did not give a reason behind their reversal, according to Thomson Reuters, which reports that more than half of the ex-partners have agreed to the settlement.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of the Dewey bankruptcy, see:
Dewey will pay to shred old client files
Dewey executives face lawsuit over $35 million bond purchase
Dewey creditors can pursue claims against firm execs, judge rules
Dewey & LeBoeuf seeks $13 million for LA Dodgers bankruptcy case
Dewey trustee objects to proposed $165,000 bonus
Infographic: The timeline of Dewey's downfall
Former Dewey partner sues management, claims they were “running a Ponzi scheme”
A group of
As part of the proposed deal, up to 125 retirees or their beneficiaries will return either $5,000 or one-quarter of the retirement payments and compensation that Dewey paid them in 2011 and 2012—whichever is smaller. They also will pay back 60 percent of any tax advances that Dewey made on their behalf during the same time period. In return, they will be immune from any future lawsuits connected with the firm's demise.
The ex-partners had previously sued Dewey for more than $80 million, arguing that the firm owed them pension benefits. They also rejected a previous clawback settlement, which more than 400 former partners signed on to last October, because it allegedly favored high-earning partners and shielded firm executives from liability in connection with Dewey's May 2012 bankruptcy.
The retirees did not give a reason behind their reversal, according to Thomson Reuters, which reports that more than half of the ex-partners have agreed to the settlement.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of the Dewey bankruptcy, see:
Dewey will pay to shred old client files
Dewey executives face lawsuit over $35 million bond purchase
Dewey creditors can pursue claims against firm execs, judge rules
Dewey trustee objects to proposed $165,000 bonus
Infographic: The timeline of Dewey's downfall
Former Dewey partner sues management, claims they were “running a Ponzi scheme”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhat to Know About the New 'Overlapping Directorship' Antitrust Development
4 minute readThe Met Hires GC of Elite University as Next Legal Chief
Tesla, Musk Appeal Chancery Compensation Case to Delaware Supreme Court
2 minute readTurning Over Legal Tedium to AI Requires Lots of Unglamorous Work on Front End
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250