Nortel settles claim with long-term disability employees
A settlement between what was once one of the countrys largest telecommunications manufacturer and its disabled employees has received preliminary approval from a bankruptcy court.
February 15, 2013 at 05:59 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
A settlement between what was once one of the country's largest telecommunications manufacturer and its disabled employees has received preliminary approval from a bankruptcy court.
The bankruptcy judge overseeing the liquidation of assets for bankrupt Nortel Networks Inc. ruled yesterday to allow the settlement to be mailed to the disable employees. The 200 employees will have until April 30 to raise objections to the settlement proposal.
Nortel agreed not to discontinue any of the long-term disability benefits before May 31 “unless the company grants the committee a general unsecured claim of $28 million,” according to Thomson Reuters.
After settlement approval, the employees will receive the general unsecured claim and at that point, have the option to sell. Some of the employees would like an independent auditor to oversee the distribution of funds.
Read recent labor related stories on InsideCounsel:
Labor: Antitrust concerns with non-hire and non-solicit agreements
5 labor and employment issues to watch in 2013
Risk of relapse counts as disability, says 1st Circuit
Proposed ALJ bias settlement would give thousands of disabled New Yorkers new benefit hearings
A settlement between what was once one of the country's largest telecommunications manufacturer and its disabled employees has received preliminary approval from a bankruptcy court.
The bankruptcy judge overseeing the liquidation of assets for bankrupt Nortel Networks Inc. ruled yesterday to allow the settlement to be mailed to the disable employees. The 200 employees will have until April 30 to raise objections to the settlement proposal.
Nortel agreed not to discontinue any of the long-term disability benefits before May 31 “unless the company grants the committee a general unsecured claim of $28 million,” according to Thomson Reuters.
After settlement approval, the employees will receive the general unsecured claim and at that point, have the option to sell. Some of the employees would like an independent auditor to oversee the distribution of funds.
Read recent labor related stories on InsideCounsel:
Labor: Antitrust concerns with non-hire and non-solicit agreements
5 labor and employment issues to watch in 2013
Risk of relapse counts as disability, says 1st Circuit
Proposed ALJ bias settlement would give thousands of disabled New Yorkers new benefit hearings
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Apple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology
Coinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute read
Baker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Trending Stories
- 1The FTC’s Noncompete Rule Is Likely Dead
- 2COVID-19 Vaccine Suit Against United Airlines Hangs on Right-to-Sue Letter Date
- 3People in the News—Jan. 10, 2025—Lamb McErlane, Saxton & Stump
- 4How I Made Partner: 'Be Open With Partners About Your Strengths,' Says Ha Jin Lee of Sullivan & Cromwell
- 5Essential Labor Shifts: Navigating Noncompetes, Workplace Politics and the AI Revolution
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
