Collaborating with outside counsel: Working together to find efficiencies
The good news for corporate counsel is that their budgets are rising.
February 20, 2013 at 02:46 AM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
The good news for corporate counsel is that their budgets are rising. In fact, the median legal department budget increased by 10.7 percent in 2011, according to Corporate Executive Board. This trend appears to give GCs more options and more flexibility when it comes to outsourcing important tasks to outside counsel.
Yet budgets are not infinite. Today, savvy GCs are collaborating more closely with outside counsel to make sure that projects are as streamlined as possible and that everyone is collaborating to find efficiencies—while still maintaining the highest standards for due diligence.
These efforts include leveraging new technologies to help make workflow processes more efficient. Traditionally manual, paper-based processes need to be automated to help firms manage their transactional work. At many law firms today, reduced staffing, increased demands from clients and the shifting roles of attorneys and paralegals are prompting a drive to do more with less.
GCs can find a win-win situation by working with law firms that have invested to streamline their operations and are using technology to simplify workflows and reduce duplicative processes such as manual rekeying of information. These investments also include the tools and training to make associates more efficient. Today's associates can often be found doing the work of paralegals—and vice versa. Automating manual tasks can help all of them handle larger and unfamiliar workloads—and take on more of the strategic work clients require.
Today, more than ever, GCs need accuracy and efficiency when it comes to the due diligence process. For example, paralegals can spend an estimated two to 50 hours per transaction rekeying and reorganizing lien search results into charts for attorneys. With accuracy and speed as competing priorities, a simple data-entry mistake can have expensive repercussions. Fortunately, there are technology solutions available to law firms to help them deliver better price value—and accuracy—to their corporate clients.
Where associates and paralegals once had to manually create spreadsheets to organize public record search results for review and analysis, this tedious task can now be done with web-based software. Such software provides associates and paralegals with quick, comprehensive and accurate chart summaries of public record search results with collateral descriptions, links to document images and other time-saving features. These solutions can even auto-populate chart content from the public record into a chart summary, which reduces manual re-keying and decreases errors. Another valuable function of this software is the ability to automate manual processes, such as follow-up steps like filing UCC-3s, to increase accuracy and improve time savings. Other features found in best-of-breed applications include organizational and workflow tools to keep due diligence processes running smoothly.
Today's software is easier than ever to use, enabling associates and paralegals with varying degrees of technology expertise to perform their jobs better. These applications also free up paralegals to do other, more valuable, work—a win-win-win for the employees, their firms and the GCs who work with them.
With so much pressure on the GC's office today, the last thing legal departments need to worry about is managing the potential costs and increased complexity of projects such as outsourced lien searches. By choosing the right outside counsel that has, in turn, chosen the right people and right technology to streamline the job, the general counsel can rest a bit easier knowing that all the key risks are being managed appropriately.
The good news for corporate counsel is that their budgets are rising. In fact, the median legal department budget increased by 10.7 percent in 2011, according to Corporate Executive Board. This trend appears to give GCs more options and more flexibility when it comes to outsourcing important tasks to outside counsel.
Yet budgets are not infinite. Today, savvy GCs are collaborating more closely with outside counsel to make sure that projects are as streamlined as possible and that everyone is collaborating to find efficiencies—while still maintaining the highest standards for due diligence.
These efforts include leveraging new technologies to help make workflow processes more efficient. Traditionally manual, paper-based processes need to be automated to help firms manage their transactional work. At many law firms today, reduced staffing, increased demands from clients and the shifting roles of attorneys and paralegals are prompting a drive to do more with less.
GCs can find a win-win situation by working with law firms that have invested to streamline their operations and are using technology to simplify workflows and reduce duplicative processes such as manual rekeying of information. These investments also include the tools and training to make associates more efficient. Today's associates can often be found doing the work of paralegals—and vice versa. Automating manual tasks can help all of them handle larger and unfamiliar workloads—and take on more of the strategic work clients require.
Today, more than ever, GCs need accuracy and efficiency when it comes to the due diligence process. For example, paralegals can spend an estimated two to 50 hours per transaction rekeying and reorganizing lien search results into charts for attorneys. With accuracy and speed as competing priorities, a simple data-entry mistake can have expensive repercussions. Fortunately, there are technology solutions available to law firms to help them deliver better price value—and accuracy—to their corporate clients.
Where associates and paralegals once had to manually create spreadsheets to organize public record search results for review and analysis, this tedious task can now be done with web-based software. Such software provides associates and paralegals with quick, comprehensive and accurate chart summaries of public record search results with collateral descriptions, links to document images and other time-saving features. These solutions can even auto-populate chart content from the public record into a chart summary, which reduces manual re-keying and decreases errors. Another valuable function of this software is the ability to automate manual processes, such as follow-up steps like filing UCC-3s, to increase accuracy and improve time savings. Other features found in best-of-breed applications include organizational and workflow tools to keep due diligence processes running smoothly.
Today's software is easier than ever to use, enabling associates and paralegals with varying degrees of technology expertise to perform their jobs better. These applications also free up paralegals to do other, more valuable, work—a win-win-win for the employees, their firms and the GCs who work with them.
With so much pressure on the GC's office today, the last thing legal departments need to worry about is managing the potential costs and increased complexity of projects such as outsourced lien searches. By choosing the right outside counsel that has, in turn, chosen the right people and right technology to streamline the job, the general counsel can rest a bit easier knowing that all the key risks are being managed appropriately.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawyers Drowning in Cases Are Embracing AI Fastest—and Say It's Yielding Better Outcomes for Clients
GC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
8 minute readWhy ACLU's New Legal Director Says It's a 'Good Time to Take the Reins'
Trending Stories
- 1Lavish 'Lies' Led to Investors Being Fleeced in Nine-Figure International Crypto Scam
- 2AstraZeneca Files Flurry of Lawsuits to Protect Cancer Treatment Drug
- 3American Airlines Legal Chief Departs for Warner Bros. Discovery
- 4New Montgomery Bar President Aims to Boost Lawyer Referral Service
- 5Deadline Extended for Southeastern Legal Awards
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250