Inventor accuses Nintendo of stealing technology for 3DS gaming system
Inventor Seijiro Tomita is accusing Nintendo Co. of infringing one of his patents with its popular 3DS handheld gaming system in a trial that began Monday.
February 26, 2013 at 06:34 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Inventor Seijiro Tomita is accusing Nintendo Co. of infringing one of his patents with its popular 3DS handheld gaming system in a trial that began Monday.
Tomita developed technology that allowed users to see 3-D images without having to wear 3-D glasses. In 2003, he had a meeting at Nintendo's Kyoto headquarters, where he displayed the technology for seven officials in the hopes of getting licensee partners while he waited for his patent application to be processed (the U.S. granted his patent in 2008, and Tomita also holds one in Japan). Four of those seven officials later helped develop the 3DS, which came out in 2011. That same year, Tomita sued the company for patent infringement. An expert for the plaintiff estimated that Tomita is entitled to $9.80 out of $169.99 for every 3DS sold.
But Nintendo claims that its meeting with Tomita was one of many it had with vendors of 3-D technology, including a meeting with Sharp Corp., which eventually made the 3DS' display. The company also argues that it does not use the key aspect of Tomita's technology—“cross-point” information, a feature that displays 3-D images on different screens.
Read more at Thomson Reuters.
For more coverage of the tech industry on InsideCounsel, see below:
Technology: 4 things to consider before acquiring a tech startup
Apple employees' computers attacked by hackers
What is Big Data and why should in-house counsel care?
Technology: GCs must strengthen their relationships with chief information security officers
Google under fire for app store privacy policy
Obama signs executive order on cybersecurity
Inventor Seijiro Tomita is accusing Nintendo Co. of infringing one of his patents with its popular 3DS handheld gaming system in a trial that began Monday.
Tomita developed technology that allowed users to see 3-D images without having to wear 3-D glasses. In 2003, he had a meeting at Nintendo's Kyoto headquarters, where he displayed the technology for seven officials in the hopes of getting licensee partners while he waited for his patent application to be processed (the U.S. granted his patent in 2008, and Tomita also holds one in Japan). Four of those seven officials later helped develop the 3DS, which came out in 2011. That same year, Tomita sued the company for patent infringement. An expert for the plaintiff estimated that Tomita is entitled to $9.80 out of $169.99 for every 3DS sold.
But Nintendo claims that its meeting with Tomita was one of many it had with vendors of 3-D technology, including a meeting with Sharp Corp., which eventually made the 3DS' display. The company also argues that it does not use the key aspect of Tomita's technology—“cross-point” information, a feature that displays 3-D images on different screens.
Read more at Thomson Reuters.
For more coverage of the tech industry on InsideCounsel, see below:
Technology: 4 things to consider before acquiring a tech startup
What is Big Data and why should in-house counsel care?
Technology: GCs must strengthen their relationships with chief information security officers
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFormer Capital One Deputy GC Takes Legal Reins of AIG Spinoff
Legal Departments Dinged for Acquiescing to Rate Hikes That 'Defy Gravity'
4 minute readApple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250