Joking Judge says his side job as a comedian is ethical
Its one thing for a judge to have a second job to supplement his income, but when that second job is as a successful comic, some in the legal field cry ethics foul.
February 28, 2013 at 04:00 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
It's one thing for a judge to have a second job to supplement his income, but when that second job is as a successful comic, some in the legal field cry ethics foul. But lawyers for Judge Vince Sicari—who moonlights as a comedian—see it differently, and argued their case in front of a New Jersey Supreme Court on Tuesday.
In 2008, a state ethics committee ruled that Sicari could no longer work as a paid comedian. Sicari, who goes by the stage name Vince August, makes $13,000 a year as a part-time judge and used the comic gigs to help supplement his income—opening up for shows such as “The Daily Show with Jon Stewart” and “The Colbert Report.”
In court documents appealing the ethics board's ruling, Sicari claimed “there is never mention in either profession of the other.” He also said he relies on personal observations and his Italian-Catholic upbringing for material.
But despite that fact, the ethics board said some of Sicari's previous work as a comedian was inappropriate for a sitting judge—citing a stint on the ABC reality show, “What Would You Do?” where he portrayed racist and homophobic characters. Committee members said in court documents that the “content of his comedy routine could give rise to an appearance of bias, partiality or impropriety or otherwise negatively affect the dignity of the judiciary.”
The court did not issue a ruling on Tuesday, but Sicari—who found his calling as a comedian when he was already a practicing lawyer—told the New York Times that if it came down to deciding between the two jobs, he would choose comedy.
Read more InsideCounsel stories about the lighter side of the practice of law.
It's one thing for a judge to have a second job to supplement his income, but when that second job is as a successful comic, some in the legal field cry ethics foul. But lawyers for Judge Vince Sicari—who moonlights as a comedian—see it differently, and argued their case in front of a New Jersey Supreme Court on Tuesday.
In 2008, a state ethics committee ruled that Sicari could no longer work as a paid comedian. Sicari, who goes by the stage name Vince August, makes $13,000 a year as a part-time judge and used the comic gigs to help supplement his income—opening up for shows such as “The Daily Show with Jon Stewart” and “The Colbert Report.”
In court documents appealing the ethics board's ruling, Sicari claimed “there is never mention in either profession of the other.” He also said he relies on personal observations and his Italian-Catholic upbringing for material.
But despite that fact, the ethics board said some of Sicari's previous work as a comedian was inappropriate for a sitting judge—citing a stint on the ABC reality show, “What Would You Do?” where he portrayed racist and homophobic characters. Committee members said in court documents that the “content of his comedy routine could give rise to an appearance of bias, partiality or impropriety or otherwise negatively affect the dignity of the judiciary.”
The court did not issue a ruling on Tuesday, but Sicari—who found his calling as a comedian when he was already a practicing lawyer—told the
Read more InsideCounsel stories about the lighter side of the practice of law.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCompanies' Obsession With Soft Skills Has Made Prized GC Posts Even Harder to Land
4 minute readMeta Workers Aren't of One Mind on Company's Retreat From DEI, Fact-Checking
Private Equity-Backed Medical Imaging Chain Hires CLO, Continuing C-Suite Makeover
Trending Stories
- 1CLOs Face Mounting Pressure As Risks Mushroom and Job Duties Expand
- 2X Faces Intense Scrutiny as EU Investigation Races to Conclusion & Looming Court Battle
- 3'Nation is in Trouble': NY Lawmakers Advance Bill to Set Parameters for Shielding Juror IDs in Criminal Matters
- 4Margolis Edelstein Broadens Leadership With New Co-Managing Partner
- 5Menendez Asks US Judge for Bond Pending Appeal of Criminal Conviction
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250