Case claims Johnson & Johnson knew about hip implant defects before recall
In the wake of Johnson & Johnsons 2010 recall of its ASR artificial hip implants, the company was slammed with more than 10,000 lawsuits.
March 01, 2013 at 06:29 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
In the wake of Johnson & Johnson's 2010 recall of its ASR artificial hip implants, the company was slammed with more than 10,000 lawsuits. Loren Kransky's was the first to make it to court.
In closing arguments on Thursday, Kransky's lawyers argued that J&J's DePuy unit knew about the artificial hip's defects when Kransky had one implanted in 2007. He claims that metal debris shed from the implant, poisoning his tissues and causing pain.
J&J argued that there was no medical consensus on what levels of the metals—chromium and cobalt—would damage patients.
“Ultimately the product did not perform as DePuy wanted it to perform or expected it to perform,” said J&J lawyer Michael Zellers.
Kransky is seeking $5 million for the suffering he underwent, and up to $179 million in punitive damages.
Read more at Thomson Reuters.
For more coverage of the healthcare industry on InsideCounsel, see below:
Court denies contraception coverage injunction
Employers can control health care costs with alternative approaches
Government investigates J&J's hip devices, surgical mesh
Johnson & Johnson will pay $63 million in Motrin case
Health care fraud probe pays off: U.S. recovers billions
In the wake of
In closing arguments on Thursday, Kransky's lawyers argued that J&J's DePuy unit knew about the artificial hip's defects when Kransky had one implanted in 2007. He claims that metal debris shed from the implant, poisoning his tissues and causing pain.
J&J argued that there was no medical consensus on what levels of the metals—chromium and cobalt—would damage patients.
“Ultimately the product did not perform as DePuy wanted it to perform or expected it to perform,” said J&J lawyer Michael Zellers.
Kransky is seeking $5 million for the suffering he underwent, and up to $179 million in punitive damages.
Read more at Thomson Reuters.
For more coverage of the healthcare industry on InsideCounsel, see below:
Court denies contraception coverage injunction
Employers can control health care costs with alternative approaches
Government investigates J&J's hip devices, surgical mesh
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
5 minute read
In-House Lawyers Are Focused on Employment and Cybersecurity Disputes, But Looking Out for Conflict Over AI
Trending Stories
- 1No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 2Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 3Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 4Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
- 5Freshfields Hires Ex-SEC Corporate Finance Director in Silicon Valley
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
