6 guidelines for restarting corporate records programs
Restarting your records program? As the economy begins to improve, many companies are either revamping or in some cases restarting their corporate records programs.
March 04, 2013 at 06:47 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Restarting your records program? As the economy begins to improve, many companies are either revamping or in some cases restarting their corporate records programs. The information governance landscape has changed in the past five years; technology can help you manage through the growing amount of information and new regulatory and compliance issues that you face. If you are doing a “reboot” then consider it as an excellent opportunity to rethink your practices so your program can add more value to the organization. Here are some key areas to consider:
1. Make electronic documents a central focus
Many older records programs were created in an era dominated by paper documents. Today, in most organizations more than 96 percent of all information and more than 90 percent of all records are either created or received in electronic format. Paper-based paradigms and processes don't always map well to electronic. Take an electronic-centric approach, and start treating paper more as an exception.
2. Determine program scope
Is your program only about records compliance, or does it include e-discovery, IT risk compliance, privacy and data security? Few organizations starting new programs focus exclusively on records. Increasingly, companies can achieve economies of scale when managing documents and data by combining compliance initiatives. Doing so, however, can make the establishment of roles and responsibilities challenging, especially in larger organizations. Think this through.
3. Organize your steering committee
Who will own policy development and program execution? In a world of digital information, we find this is often a shared responsibility among legal, compliance, IT and the business units. There is a “win” for all stakeholders, so why “go it alone”? Form a cross-functional committee to guide the effort, especially if your program requires a new technology component.
4. Assess your internal skills
If your current records team is used to dealing only with paper, then relaunching your program exclusively with this team is likely to generate a continuation of a paper-based approach. Take a skills inventory of your team and consider additional training, recruiting or enlisting outside help to develop necessary expertise.
5. Decide when to relaunch
Timing is important, both in life and when relauching your program. Synchronize the launch with other initiatives, and create realistic timelines. Break big projects into small pieces.
6. Get tactical in an imperfect world
While timing is important, it is also true that rarely is the timing ideal. Too often companies wait for either the perfect time frame or until they've developed perfect policies. Information governance is an inherently imperfect process, so striving for perfection often leads to never really starting. It's better to put a good (albeit imperfect) program in place today, and work to improve it over time.
Key Takeaways
- Many companies are restarting or revamping their records programs.
- Be sure that your program focuses on electronic information.
- Don't do these alone – create a steering committee with legal, IT and other stakeholders.
- Make sure you have the right internal skills.
- Be smart on your timing and execution, but don't wait for the perfect moment which may never arrive.
Legal Information Is Not Legal Advice
Contoural provides information regarding business, compliance and litigation trends and issues for educational and planning purposes. However, legal information is not the same as legal advice — the application of law to an individual or organization's specific circumstances. Contoural and its consultants do not provide legal advice. Readers should consult with competent legal counsel for professional assurance that our information, and any interpretation of it, is appropriate to each reader's particular situation. Copyright © Contoural, Inc. 2013
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Tech Is Cozying Up to President Trump. Here's Why Their Lawyers Are Cautiously Optimistic
Starbucks Hands New CLO Hefty Raise, Says He Fosters 'Environment of Courage and Joy'
Internal Whistleblowing Surged Globally in 2024, So Why Were US Numbers Flat?
6 minute readMeta Workers Aren't of One Mind on Company's Retreat From DEI, Fact-Checking
Trending Stories
- 1How Some Elite Law Firms Are Growing Equity Partner Ranks Faster Than Others
- 2Fried Frank Partner Leaves for Paul Hastings to Start Tech Transactions Practice
- 3Stradley Ronon Welcomes Insurance Team From Mintz
- 4Weil Adds Acting Director of SEC Enforcement, Continuing Government Hiring Streak
- 5Monday Newspaper
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250