Maintain control of your career when the unexpected strikes
The psychology of sudden job loss merits some attention here, if only to say that recruiters do get it.
March 11, 2013 at 07:43 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
How did you react last month to the Carnival cruise ship engine failure news coverage? If you had a friend or relative on-board, you were probably keenly interested and certainly sympathetic to real discomfort suffered by the passengers. Otherwise, I suspect it simply caught your attention, if at all, as an unlikely and perhaps interesting predicament. Since a safe outcome seemed clear, many people reacted without much empathy, and I'm sure some even chuckled at a less than luxurious turn of events for leisure travelers.
This is what I thought about: inside counsel in mid to late career, enjoying good runs with stable employers. And I thought about the kind of phone call I get once or twice every month. It's a call for help from an attorney who has been laid off but truly did not see it coming. Total unexpected engine failure in the midst of a seemingly smooth cruise.
The event is traumatic for the attorney experiencing it, and family members certainly share in the discomfort. But the outside world is pretty much unmoved by the plight of unemployed attorneys. Unemployed auto workers, new grads struggling to find work and starving artists have the general public as a supportive rooting section. When I'm at a cocktail party with nonlawyer friends, mention of an unemployed attorney yields a yawn at best, and candidly the reaction can include a smirk or smile. There is not much sympathy out there for inside counsel who experience personal engine failure.
Ok, so this won't go down as my most uplifting column. But I think the psychology of sudden job loss merits some attention here, if only to say that recruiters do “get it.” I may maintain a clinical-style distance when discussing options with attorneys who call our firm, but I do appreciate the gravity of this situation. In addition to outplacement counselors and career coaches, I have referred some inside counsel to therapists. Anyone who is truly blindsided by a termination needs to get through the emotions of anger and loss, and quickly. Most people try to do that in their own silo.
For any newly unemployed inside counsel seeking a practical Rx for this situation, you know there is no magic pill. But here is the correct formula:
1. Force yourself to take 48 hours to breath before taking action. Emails and calls made immediately after a layoff tend to be full of emotions and mistakes.
2. During those same 48 hours, gather all of your relationship contact information and prepare a call list.
3. If you are at all unsure about how to approach your network with the news and for help, see a career coach or outplacement counselor before proceeding.
4. Contact everyone, be thorough, and don't be embarrassed or hesitant. You will get help from unexpected parts of your network.
5. After the initial break-in period of steps one through three, make the search your full-time job and refuse to prioritize anything above it. If you do, you are making excuses. I know this kind of “I need a job” networking activity is painful. Break it up with exercise, family time, and an evening cocktail if you like, but discipline yourself away from procrastination.
Your family and friends will be sympathetic and help you, but they won't push you. My tough love advice is to push yourself very hard and approach your search with complete and absolute tenacity. Your next employer will hire and respect you for it.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBallooning Workloads, Dearth of Advancement Opportunities Prime In-House Attorneys to Pull Exit Hatch
The Reason a GC Abruptly Departs May Not Be What You Think
Trending Stories
- 1Can The Threat of a Bar Complaint Be a Settlement Tool?
- 2Sentencing Commission Addresses Inconsistent Definitions of “Loss”
- 3What Are Forbidden Sexual Relations With Clients?
- 4AEDI Takeaways: Demystifying Hype, Changing Caselaw & Harvey’s CEO Talks State of Industry
- 5New England Law | Boston Announces New Dean
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250