5 ways to protect your company from discount fraud
If your companys products are in high demand, it can be highly profitable for others to obtain your products at steep discounts by making fraudulent misrepresentations, only to turn around and resell the products into the marketplace.
March 13, 2013 at 04:10 AM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
If your company's products are in high demand, it can be highly profitable for others to obtain your products at steep discounts by making fraudulent misrepresentations, only to turn around and resell the products into the marketplace. Sophisticated fraud schemes like this, aimed at finding the weaknesses in your company's discount sales programs, are hitting organizations in industries from software, to pharmaceuticals, to consumer products. The bottom line is this: If you have a discount program, you may have a problem that needs to be addressed.
For many companies, it is a business necessity to authorize special discounts to certain customers who can demonstrate a particular project or business that would justify forfeiting profits on their products. And while many of these opportunities are genuine—and lead to additional revenue—one-off cases exist where the statements made to obtain the discounts are false. Not surprisingly, most of those heavily discounted products do not wind up with the supposed end user, but are sold elsewhere for a profit.
These schemes mean lost profits to you and your channel partners, increased costs and marketplace disruption. What can your company do about it?
Once uncovered, discount fraud schemes can lead to serious consequences for the perpetrators. Consider these recent prosecutions:
- U.S. v. Mirza Ali: Defendants were sent to prison for 60 months each and ordered to pay $20 million in restitution to Microsoft, for a scheme where they made false statements to obtain $30 million in products on which they received about $20 million in special discounts available to educational institutions. The defendants falsely pledged to sell the discounted products only to “educational users,” but instead sold 90 percent of the software to commercial entities.
- Dina Wein-Reis, a well-known New York socialite, pleaded guilty and now must serve 31 months in prison and pay $7 million in restitution for a fraud scheme in which she tricked well-known manufacturers and distributors of consumer products into selling her merchandise at incredibly discounted prices by falsely promising them that her company would distribute those products as samples to non-profit organizations. In reality, Wein-Reis actually sold the goods at substantial profit to wholesalers, retail stores and others.
- Joseph Monahan pleaded guilty and was recently sentenced to 18 months in prison and ordered to pay $1,845,128.70 in restitution for a fraud scheme in which he and a business partner deceived a large technology company into providing substantial discounts on products that were allegedly being sold to particular end users. Instead, the products were being ordered by, and sold to, a large unauthorized reseller of products, which then sold the discounted goods in competition with honest channel partners.
Even the most vigilant of companies have fallen victim to these deceptions. Many are now proactively tackling prevention of these crimes. Whether your company has already been hit by these schemes or has merely identified them as a potential problem, there are steps you can take to mitigate fraud risks.
Here are a number of tactics we think work.
1. Secure internal support
Educate your key executives about how these fraud schemes work and the consequences of failing to identify fraudulent deals. They need to recognize that “a sale is not a sale,” and that deals rooted in discount fraud schemes distort revenue, harm honest partners, inequitably distribute sales commission credit to the internal sales team and undermine the integrity of point-of-sale data. With executive support, you will be able to take steps to tackle this problem.
2. Employ end user verification
Protecting your company from fraud often simply means “not taking people's word for it.” When business reasons justify authorizing additional discounts on your products, you need processes in place to verify the legitimacy of the information the end user is providing. The thoroughness of your investigation is the key first step to thwarting potential abuses. Your sales teams need to vet the proposed deal according to a protocol that intensifies the level of review based on the level of risk.
Precautions some companies take to ensure the end user is legitimate include meeting that end user in person, clarifying exactly how the products are to be used, or even making a site visit to where the products will be housed. Companies should consider formalizing the process by requiring written verification of the end user's intent not to resell the products, but to use them solely for internal purposes.
3. Identify your company's internal tools
Ensure the deal is well-documented. Capturing the communications confirming the details of the deal is crucial to protecting your company. A clear and strong paper trail begins with attaining basic end user information. However, you should chronicle, in writing, all of the specifics of the deal, so that if it goes bad, you can prove that it was fraudulent at the inception.
Pay attention to sales data, such as point-of-sale data and warranty returns. Critical information about discount fraud deals is often at your fingertips. You may already know who is supposed to have particular products, which are identified by serial number. A mismatch in data between the purported end user of a product and the entity that ended up with it could mean a potential diversion deal requiring further investigation.
4. Train your sales team
You want your sales team to understand your company's internal processes and the reasons your company is aggressively taking measures to prevent this fraud from occurring. By educating your employees about how these schemes work, how to recognize them and the significant financial impact fraud has on the business, you can arm them with the tools to identify fraudulent deals.
Depending on the size of your sales team and the scope of potential fraudulent activity, you should consider requiring training sessions on your company's screening and verification procedures.
5. Engage with your channel partners
Discount fraud hurts honest channel partners when discounted products end up at a broker and are used to defeat a competing bid from a partner. These partners can't compete against the low prices that can be offered on products procured through such fraud.
In all likelihood, your company's partners have already been vocal about these issues. Tap into them as a resource because they are a valuable source of information regarding partner harm. There may be deals they have lost or other word-of-mouth information that can provide leads for investigating these crimes.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawyers Drowning in Cases Are Embracing AI Fastest—and Say It's Yielding Better Outcomes for Clients
GC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
8 minute readWhy ACLU's New Legal Director Says It's a 'Good Time to Take the Reins'
Trending Stories
- 1New York Court of Appeals Blocks Trump Attempt to Stay Friday Sentencing
- 2'Self-Diagnosed Nickel Allergy' Fails to Find Success in Med-Mal Suit, 8th Circuit Rules
- 3Eversheds Sutherland Adds Hunton Andrews Energy Lawyer With Cross-Border Experience
- 4Balancing Judicial Authority: Understanding Sanctions, Severance, and Interferences
- 5Up in the Air: Boeing’s Deferred Prosecution Saga Continues
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250