EU regulators warn of mobile app privacy concerns
Mobile apps are under fire yet again, this time from privacy regulators across the pond, who expressed concern over the personal data these apps are collecting from users.
March 14, 2013 at 07:42 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Mobile apps are under fire yet again, this time from privacy regulators across the pond, who expressed concern over the personal data these apps are collecting from users.
The Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, which comprises 27 European Union data protection authorities, warned in a joint opinion that consumers are not always aware that some apps are accessing and storing personal information such as names, email addresses and geolocation information.
“Individuals must be in control of their own personal data,” the group said in a statement. “Therefore apps must provide sufficient information about what data they are processing before it takes place in order to obtain meaningful consent.”
The Article 29 group also issued guidelines in which it instructed app developers and app stores to take additional steps to safeguard privacy, such as asking permission before collecting user data, removing personal data from their servers if a user uninstalls an app and setting expiration dates for apps that have not been used for a prolonged period of time.
In January, the European Parliament's Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs recommended amending the EU's privacy rules to allow Internet users to find out what data companies have collected from them, among other changes. Companies that did not comply with the regulations could face fines of up to 2 percent of their yearly global sales under the proposed amendments.
Read more at Bloomberg.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of privacy issues, see:
Mobile apps are under fire yet again, this time from privacy regulators across the pond, who expressed concern over the personal data these apps are collecting from users.
The Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, which comprises 27 European Union data protection authorities, warned in a joint opinion that consumers are not always aware that some apps are accessing and storing personal information such as names, email addresses and geolocation information.
“Individuals must be in control of their own personal data,” the group said in a statement. “Therefore apps must provide sufficient information about what data they are processing before it takes place in order to obtain meaningful consent.”
The Article 29 group also issued guidelines in which it instructed app developers and app stores to take additional steps to safeguard privacy, such as asking permission before collecting user data, removing personal data from their servers if a user uninstalls an app and setting expiration dates for apps that have not been used for a prolonged period of time.
In January, the European Parliament's Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs recommended amending the EU's privacy rules to allow Internet users to find out what data companies have collected from them, among other changes. Companies that did not comply with the regulations could face fines of up to 2 percent of their yearly global sales under the proposed amendments.
Read more at Bloomberg.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of privacy issues, see:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSenators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anticompetitive Practices, Fees
Trump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
Trump Likely to Keep Up Antitrust Enforcement, but Dial Back the Antagonism
5 minute readFTC Sues Cash-Advance Fintech Dave, Says It Deceives the 'Financially Vulnerable'
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250