Managing a global legal department: Collaborating across the organization
The theoretical target for any legal organization is compliance with 100 percent of all applicable laws, regulations and company policies in 100 percent of all applicable jurisdictions with 100 percent of its employees.
March 25, 2013 at 05:15 AM
9 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
This is the third in a four-part series in which Oracle Associate General Counsel Suchitra Narayen, QuisLex CEO Ram Vasudevan and consultant Rees Morrison will discuss the opportunities and challenges facing a global legal department. Read parts one and two.
The theoretical target for any legal organization is compliance with 100 percent of all applicable laws, regulations and company policies in 100 percent of all applicable jurisdictions with 100 percent of its employees.
As we discussed in part one of this series, as companies grow and expand globally, each of these variables increases in size and complexity while the legal department typically remains a small organization relative to the overall business. In addition, legal, sales, engineering, finance and other organizations have different perspectives, use different “languages” and possibly inhabit different planets altogether. Add a layer of regional and cultural variation and geographic distance to the mix and the complexity grows exponentially. To be effective, a global legal department must necessarily collaborate with other organizations to facilitate compliance with legal requirements and company policies.
Identify and leverage key business processes and systems: Although some lawyers perceive processes as starting when someone first contacts the legal department, in reality, any business process, whether related to development, sales or other business activities, starts long before the initial contact with the legal department (e.g., with a sales person pitching a prospective client about new products or services) and ends long afterwards (e.g., with the actual order for products or services under the contract finalized with the assistance of the legal department). Inserting the legal requirements into the existing business process or system allows the legal department to more readily intersect with its internal clients and leverage what it is already doing anyway. However, the larger the company, the greater the risk that there are multiple processes and systems, so identifying and integrating legal requirements and processes into each relevant process or system can be a challenge.
Communicate in a “non-lawyerly” way that balances simplicity and clarity: Even when lawyers think they are writing simple, short, clear instructions, they are faced with the complaint that there are “too many words” for the typical engineer or sales rep. Consider using charts, diagrams and other language- neutral communication tools that internal clients use for their regular business communications. The challenge, of course, is that a chart may result in too simplistic a message that is misunderstood or misapplied by the business organizations, but adding explanations or qualifiers to ensure sufficient clarity will get us back to the “too many words” problem.
Tailor timing, tone and nature of engagement to be most effective: Recognize that “ASAP” or “urgent” may have a different meaning based upon local culture and priorities and that the strength and directness of a message may have to be tailored so that it is actually heard and accepted by the local audience. For example, a strong anticorruption message may be expected or even required in countries that rank high on the corruption index but it will be important to avoid being perceived as passing moral judgment on either the local customs or local employees, which could, in many cases, be counter-productive.
Invest in learning something about the other organization/region/country: An attorney from one region reported that even colleagues in his own legal department did not know in which continent his home country was located. Today, with access to copious amounts of information available on internal and public websites, there is no excuse for not taking the time to learn something about the local organization with which you seek to collaborate. It may help you avoid pitfalls and if nothing else, you will be appreciated for making the effort to learn something about the organization.
Deliver value to and seek sponsorship from other organizations: Don't assume that a contract or compliance with a legal requirement is the end goal. Delivering business value in addition to legal value can facilitate cooperation from other organizations and sponsorship from key business executives. For example, if legal can provide a periodic update about contracts completed to someone tracking win rates or persuade key business executives that it is more profitable and efficient to do things in a legally compliant way by correlating specific investigation costs or claims to adverse margin/profitability/schedule impact, it will be much easier to gain support.
While working within the legal department of a global company, it is easy to feel like a small “David” facing a large “Goliath,” so consciously leveraging Goliath's resources and weight will be critical to the legal department's effectiveness.
The authors would like to thank Lucio Maria Fabani Larranaga, Legal Director, Oracle LAD Legal for his help and input with this installment of the series.
Questions about this article may be addressed to Mr. Vasudevan at [email protected].
This is the third in a four-part series in which Oracle Associate General Counsel Suchitra Narayen, QuisLex CEO Ram Vasudevan and consultant Rees Morrison will discuss the opportunities and challenges facing a global legal department. Read parts one and two.
The theoretical target for any legal organization is compliance with 100 percent of all applicable laws, regulations and company policies in 100 percent of all applicable jurisdictions with 100 percent of its employees.
As we discussed in part one of this series, as companies grow and expand globally, each of these variables increases in size and complexity while the legal department typically remains a small organization relative to the overall business. In addition, legal, sales, engineering, finance and other organizations have different perspectives, use different “languages” and possibly inhabit different planets altogether. Add a layer of regional and cultural variation and geographic distance to the mix and the complexity grows exponentially. To be effective, a global legal department must necessarily collaborate with other organizations to facilitate compliance with legal requirements and company policies.
Identify and leverage key business processes and systems: Although some lawyers perceive processes as starting when someone first contacts the legal department, in reality, any business process, whether related to development, sales or other business activities, starts long before the initial contact with the legal department (e.g., with a sales person pitching a prospective client about new products or services) and ends long afterwards (e.g., with the actual order for products or services under the contract finalized with the assistance of the legal department). Inserting the legal requirements into the existing business process or system allows the legal department to more readily intersect with its internal clients and leverage what it is already doing anyway. However, the larger the company, the greater the risk that there are multiple processes and systems, so identifying and integrating legal requirements and processes into each relevant process or system can be a challenge.
Communicate in a “non-lawyerly” way that balances simplicity and clarity: Even when lawyers think they are writing simple, short, clear instructions, they are faced with the complaint that there are “too many words” for the typical engineer or sales rep. Consider using charts, diagrams and other language- neutral communication tools that internal clients use for their regular business communications. The challenge, of course, is that a chart may result in too simplistic a message that is misunderstood or misapplied by the business organizations, but adding explanations or qualifiers to ensure sufficient clarity will get us back to the “too many words” problem.
Tailor timing, tone and nature of engagement to be most effective: Recognize that “ASAP” or “urgent” may have a different meaning based upon local culture and priorities and that the strength and directness of a message may have to be tailored so that it is actually heard and accepted by the local audience. For example, a strong anticorruption message may be expected or even required in countries that rank high on the corruption index but it will be important to avoid being perceived as passing moral judgment on either the local customs or local employees, which could, in many cases, be counter-productive.
Invest in learning something about the other organization/region/country: An attorney from one region reported that even colleagues in his own legal department did not know in which continent his home country was located. Today, with access to copious amounts of information available on internal and public websites, there is no excuse for not taking the time to learn something about the local organization with which you seek to collaborate. It may help you avoid pitfalls and if nothing else, you will be appreciated for making the effort to learn something about the organization.
Deliver value to and seek sponsorship from other organizations: Don't assume that a contract or compliance with a legal requirement is the end goal. Delivering business value in addition to legal value can facilitate cooperation from other organizations and sponsorship from key business executives. For example, if legal can provide a periodic update about contracts completed to someone tracking win rates or persuade key business executives that it is more profitable and efficient to do things in a legally compliant way by correlating specific investigation costs or claims to adverse margin/profitability/schedule impact, it will be much easier to gain support.
While working within the legal department of a global company, it is easy to feel like a small “David” facing a large “Goliath,” so consciously leveraging Goliath's resources and weight will be critical to the legal department's effectiveness.
The authors would like to thank Lucio Maria Fabani Larranaga, Legal Director, Oracle LAD Legal for his help and input with this installment of the series.
Questions about this article may be addressed to Mr. Vasudevan at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
8 minute readWhy ACLU's New Legal Director Says It's a 'Good Time to Take the Reins'
'Utterly Bewildering': GCs Struggle to Grasp Scattershot Nature of Law Firm Rate Hikes
Trending Stories
- 1Daniel Habib to Serve as Next Attorney-in-Charge of NY Federal Defender Appeals Unit
- 2Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege in the Modern Age of Communications
- 3High-Profile Sidley M&A Partner Heads to Covington
- 4Stars and Gripes: Firms Need a 'Superstar Culture' to Crack the U.S. Market
- 5BCLP Exploring Merger Prospects as Profitability Lags, Partnership Shrinks
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250