Judge strikes down restrictions on “morning after” pill
Reproductive rights advocates have reason to celebrate. A Brooklyn federal judge has ordered the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to make the morning after pill available to women of all ages and without a prescription.
April 05, 2013 at 06:33 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Reproductive rights advocates have reason to celebrate. A Brooklyn federal judge has ordered the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to make the “morning after” pill available to women of all ages and without a prescription.
Currently, the government enforces age restrictions on nonprescription sales of emergency contraception pills to girls who are 16 years old or younger. For more than a decade, the Center for Reproductive Rights and other advocacy groups have petitioned the FDA to strike down the restrictions, saying there is no scientific proof that girls younger than 17 couldn't safely use the drug without supervision. Additionally, Teva Pharmaceuticals Ltd., the maker of the first nonprescription emergency contraceptive pill available in the U.S., petitioned the government to allow nonprescription sales of its Plan B One-Step without restrictions.
In 2011, the FDA determined that girls younger than 17 could safely and properly use Plan B One-Step without supervision. But Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius overruled the recommendation, and a few days later, the FDA also rejected the advocacy groups' petition to lift restrictions on Plan B One-Step. In his decision, U.S. District Judge Edward Korman called Sebelius' actions “politically motivated, scientifically unjustified, and contrary to agency precedent.” He ordered the FDA to make Plan B One-Step and its generic versions available without restrictions within 30 days.
Read the New York Times and Thomson Reuters more about the ruling.
For more InsideCounsel stories about legal battles over contraception, read:
Bayer settles claims of gallbladder injury caused by Yasmin and Yaz contraceptives
Bayer designates $1.5 billion for litigation over Yasmin and Yaz contraceptives
Court denies contraception coverage injunction
Birth control exemptions fail to stop lawsuits
Hobby Lobby loses appeal of contraception coverage
Hobby Lobby must cover morning-after pill, judge rules
Obamacare faces another lawsuit over contraception coverage
Woman sues birth control pill maker for unintended pregnancy
Reproductive rights advocates have reason to celebrate. A Brooklyn federal judge has ordered the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to make the “morning after” pill available to women of all ages and without a prescription.
Currently, the government enforces age restrictions on nonprescription sales of emergency contraception pills to girls who are 16 years old or younger. For more than a decade, the Center for Reproductive Rights and other advocacy groups have petitioned the FDA to strike down the restrictions, saying there is no scientific proof that girls younger than 17 couldn't safely use the drug without supervision. Additionally, Teva Pharmaceuticals Ltd., the maker of the first nonprescription emergency contraceptive pill available in the U.S., petitioned the government to allow nonprescription sales of its Plan B One-Step without restrictions.
In 2011, the FDA determined that girls younger than 17 could safely and properly use Plan B One-Step without supervision. But Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius overruled the recommendation, and a few days later, the FDA also rejected the advocacy groups' petition to lift restrictions on Plan B One-Step. In his decision, U.S. District Judge Edward Korman called Sebelius' actions “politically motivated, scientifically unjustified, and contrary to agency precedent.” He ordered the FDA to make Plan B One-Step and its generic versions available without restrictions within 30 days.
Read the
For more InsideCounsel stories about legal battles over contraception, read:
Bayer settles claims of gallbladder injury caused by Yasmin and Yaz contraceptives
Bayer designates $1.5 billion for litigation over Yasmin and Yaz contraceptives
Court denies contraception coverage injunction
Birth control exemptions fail to stop lawsuits
Hobby Lobby loses appeal of contraception coverage
Hobby Lobby must cover morning-after pill, judge rules
Obamacare faces another lawsuit over contraception coverage
Woman sues birth control pill maker for unintended pregnancy
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology
Coinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute readBaker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Trending Stories
- 1Church of Scientology Set to Depose Phila. Attorney in Sexual Abuse Case
- 2An AG Just Specified How AI Could Get You in Hot Water
- 3Supreme Court Appears to Lean Toward Letting TikTok Ban Take Effect
- 4Standing Spat: Split 2nd Circuit Lets Challenge to Pfizer Diversity Program Proceed
- 5Judge Jablonski and Chief Justice Rabner Both Acted Completely Properly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250