BP faces more than 2,200 new spill lawsuits
Its been just over three years since the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, but, for BP, the litigation may just be beginning.
April 30, 2013 at 07:55 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
It's been just over three years since the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, but, for BP, the litigation may just be beginning.
In the past several weeks, the oil company has been hit with a flurry of more than 2,200 new lawsuits, most of them brought under the U.S. Oil Pollution Act of 1990, which has a three-year statute of limitations that expired on April 20.
BP says it will attempt to have these new lawsuits consolidated into an ongoing trial based in New Orleans. The first phase of that trial ended earlier this month, and U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier is currently considering how to divide blame for the spill among BP and its drilling partners, Transocean Ltd. and Halliburton Co. The judge is also set to rule if any of the three defendants acted with gross negligence in connection with the spill, which could quadruple the amount of penalties they would pay under the Clean Water Act.
BP has already set aside $20 billion to settle spill-related claims, but the company recently announced that only $1.7 billion of that total is still unassigned, Thomson Reuters reports. The oil giant has already revised the estimated cost of a settlement with individuals and businesses affected by the spill from $7.8 billion to $8.2 billion—not including claims that have yet to be filed or processed.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of the ongoing BP saga, see:
Florida sues BP for oil spill damages
First phase of BP spill trial ends
BP settlement costs rise again
BP enters plea in Gulf oil spill criminal case
BP will pay $4.5 billion in Deepwater Horizon oil spill settlement
BP, plaintiffs ask judge to approve $7.8 billion oil spill settlement
Feds to pursue gross negligence claims in BP oil spill case
Transocean GC resigns, effective immediately
It's been just over three years since the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, but, for BP, the litigation may just be beginning.
In the past several weeks, the oil company has been hit with a flurry of more than 2,200 new lawsuits, most of them brought under the U.S. Oil Pollution Act of 1990, which has a three-year statute of limitations that expired on April 20.
BP says it will attempt to have these new lawsuits consolidated into an ongoing trial based in New Orleans. The first phase of that trial ended earlier this month, and U.S. District Judge
BP has already set aside $20 billion to settle spill-related claims, but the company recently announced that only $1.7 billion of that total is still unassigned, Thomson Reuters reports. The oil giant has already revised the estimated cost of a settlement with individuals and businesses affected by the spill from $7.8 billion to $8.2 billion—not including claims that have yet to be filed or processed.
For more InsideCounsel coverage of the ongoing BP saga, see:
Florida sues BP for oil spill damages
First phase of BP spill trial ends
BP settlement costs rise again
BP enters plea in Gulf oil spill criminal case
BP will pay $4.5 billion in Deepwater Horizon oil spill settlement
BP, plaintiffs ask judge to approve $7.8 billion oil spill settlement
Feds to pursue gross negligence claims in BP oil spill case
Transocean GC resigns, effective immediately
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Apple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology
Coinbase Hit With Antitrust Suit That Seeks to Change How Crypto Exchanges Operate
3 minute read
Baker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Trending Stories
- 1Many LA County Law Firms Remain Open, Mobilize to Support Affected Employees Amid Historic Firestorm
- 2Stevens & Lee Names New Delaware Shareholder
- 3U.S. Supreme Court Denies Trump Effort to Halt Sentencing
- 4From CLO to President: Kevin Boon Takes the Helm at Mysten Labs
- 5How Law Schools Fared on California's July 2024 Bar Exam
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
