Greenberg Traurig, Heller Ehrman settle malpractice suit
Greenberg Traurig has agreed to pay $4.9 million to settle a lawsuit accusing it of malpractice.
April 30, 2013 at 07:12 AM
24 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Greenberg Traurig has agreed to pay $4.9 million to settle a lawsuit accusing it of malpractice.
First, some background. In 2011, the now-defunct law firm Heller Ehrman sued Greenberg, claiming its negligence contributed to Heller's spiral into dissolution in December 2008. According to Heller, when it hired Greenberg in June 2008, Greenberg didn't disclose that it also separately represented Bank of America Corp. (BofA), which for 17 years had lent Heller millions of dollars. Heller claimed Greenberg failed to discover that BofA had terminated its security interest in Heller before the law firm dissolved.
“Had Heller been alerted to this key fact at the time of its dissolution, Heller could have filed for bankruptcy and prevented its banks from seizing tens of millions from the firm and forcing Heller to try to wind-down in a chaotic, disorderly posture,” Heller said in its lawsuit, in which it sought “tens of millions of dollars,” according to the Wall Street Journal Law Blog.
Yesterday, the two parties reached a settlement agreement in which Greenberg agreed to pay Heller $4.9 million to settle the allegations, which it denies are true.
“We are confident that had the matter continued, there would have been a finding that our attorneys had acted properly and in our client's best interest,” Greenberg spokeswoman Jill Perry told the Law Blog.
The settlement will move forward if a bankruptcy judge approves it next month.
Read more recent law firm news from InsideCounsel:
First, some background. In 2011, the now-defunct law firm Heller Ehrman sued Greenberg, claiming its negligence contributed to Heller's spiral into dissolution in December 2008. According to Heller, when it hired Greenberg in June 2008, Greenberg didn't disclose that it also separately represented
“Had Heller been alerted to this key fact at the time of its dissolution, Heller could have filed for bankruptcy and prevented its banks from seizing tens of millions from the firm and forcing Heller to try to wind-down in a chaotic, disorderly posture,” Heller said in its lawsuit, in which it sought “tens of millions of dollars,” according to the Wall Street Journal Law Blog.
Yesterday, the two parties reached a settlement agreement in which Greenberg agreed to pay Heller $4.9 million to settle the allegations, which it denies are true.
“We are confident that had the matter continued, there would have been a finding that our attorneys had acted properly and in our client's best interest,” Greenberg spokeswoman Jill Perry told the Law Blog.
The settlement will move forward if a bankruptcy judge approves it next month.
Read more recent law firm news from InsideCounsel:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readOld Laws, New Tricks: Lawyers Using Patchwork of Creative Legal Theories to Target New Tech
Lawsuit Against Amazon Could Reshape E-Commerce Landscape
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250