Ogletree Deakins loses another group of lawyers
Anyone who didnt know any better may wonder if a mass exodus was afoot at Atlanta-based law firm Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart.
May 03, 2013 at 07:20 AM
31 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Anyone who didn't know any better may wonder if a mass exodus was afoot at Atlanta-based law firm Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart.
This week, the firm accepted the resignation of six lawyers—all of whom are expected to head over to competing labor and employment firm Littler Mendelson. Last week, the firm lost another six lawyers. And all of them also jumped ship for Littler.
The 12-lawyer exodus is all happening in the wake of the departure of Ogletree's former vice president and shareholder Don Prophete. Amid what seems to have been some major in-house drama, Prophete tendered his resignation in March, claiming the firm had mistreated a fellow Ogletree colleague. Last week, Prophete announced he was going to Littler … and he was taking six Ogletree lawyers with him.
One of the lawyers who left with Phophete told Thomson Reuters the weeks leading up to his resignation were “chaotic” and everyone was “waiting to see what would happen next.”
Above the Law has a detailed story about the events leading up to Prophete's departure, including excerpts from his scathing resignation letter.
Ogletree Deakins Managing Shareholder Kim Ebert said the firm is disappointed the lawyers are leaving, but their departure will not impact Ogletree's commitment to its clients or its growth model, pointing out that the firm has opened two offices and added 15 lateral shareholders this year.
“While we hate to see these 12 attorneys leave, we have more than 650 lawyers who successfully practice with us in 44 offices, and our focus is on them and our outstanding clients,” he says.
Ebert also said that the 12 lawyers to leave with Prophete are far fewer than the former Ogletree shareholder claimed would follow him. “Only four of the 20 lawyers in Kansas City (where Prophete was based) have chosen to join him, and those lawyers who had worked with him the longest have chosen to stay with our firm,” Ebert adds.
Read more law firm news on InsideCounsel:
Anyone who didn't know any better may wonder if a mass exodus was afoot at Atlanta-based law firm
This week, the firm accepted the resignation of six lawyers—all of whom are expected to head over to competing labor and employment firm
The 12-lawyer exodus is all happening in the wake of the departure of Ogletree's former vice president and shareholder Don Prophete. Amid what seems to have been some major in-house drama, Prophete tendered his resignation in March, claiming the firm had mistreated a fellow Ogletree colleague. Last week, Prophete announced he was going to Littler … and he was taking six Ogletree lawyers with him.
One of the lawyers who left with Phophete told Thomson Reuters the weeks leading up to his resignation were “chaotic” and everyone was “waiting to see what would happen next.”
Above the Law has a detailed story about the events leading up to Prophete's departure, including excerpts from his scathing resignation letter.
“While we hate to see these 12 attorneys leave, we have more than 650 lawyers who successfully practice with us in 44 offices, and our focus is on them and our outstanding clients,” he says.
Ebert also said that the 12 lawyers to leave with Prophete are far fewer than the former Ogletree shareholder claimed would follow him. “Only four of the 20 lawyers in Kansas City (where Prophete was based) have chosen to join him, and those lawyers who had worked with him the longest have chosen to stay with our firm,” Ebert adds.
Read more law firm news on InsideCounsel:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRepublican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
4 minute readSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
FTC Lauds Withdrawal of Proposed Indiana Hospitals Merger After Leaning on State Regulators
4 minute readHow Qualcomm’s General Counsel Is Championing Diversity in Innovation
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250